A Captivating Short Story, Thematically Connected to Missing Persons, to Grip Your Imagination

Prologue

As the author of this blog, Shane Lambert, I typically focus on topics surrounding missing people, unsolved mysteries, forensics, and the societal issues that intersect with these topics. However, I’ve decided to share a short story of mine, "On Being Indistinguishable," on this platform, despite it being a departure from my usual nonfiction content.

I feel this story is thematically resonant with the blog’s core focus on missing persons and society, partly because it involves hitchhiking. Through the lens of a well-meaning driver who picks up a hitchhiker, the narrative explores the complexities of hitchhiking, particularly from the driver’s perspective.

It delves into the tension of being perceived as suspicious, simply for being a man offering a ride to a vulnerable woman, and the broader societal prejudices that shape such encounters. I hope this fictional piece sparks reflection on trust and safety, but mainly it's meant as social criticism of how philanthropy can crumble in a society that lacks both of those things.

On Being Indistinguishable

I lost my resort-town job in Jasper, Alberta, in early October 2010. But entering unemployment didn’t bother me that much, as I had some money in the bank and I knew I would qualify for employment insurance. As I prepared to leave town, my thoughts were only on the immediate future, and my hopes were high that I would enjoy a long and scenic drive between the Canadian Rockies and the West Coast, my home. It was only when I decided to stop for a hitchhiker that I opened the door for some unwanted drama in what otherwise could have been an enjoyable day.

I left Jasper on the Yellowhead Highway just after dawn on a Wednesday. The morning was crisp in the fall, and the air felt fresh. As I drove, I listened to the CBC radio for a short time before the signal cut out. I’m sure that was due to the remoteness of the area and maybe even the mountainous terrain.

When I was about 30 kilometers out of town, I spotted an anomaly in the distance on my side of the road. As I neared this blip, I realized that it was a young woman. She was standing a little over the yellow line with her neck stretched out as she stood still and faced the traffic in my lane. It was an odd scene, really, to see a young woman standing in a remote location with no other cars around so early in the morning. Her right thumb was pointed upwards, the universal request for help in the form of a free ride.

I couldn't help but wonder how she had arrived at such a desolate point on the highway, especially at such an early hour. She couldn't, I thought, have walked there from the nearest hotel, which was back in Jasper. In my mind, that meant that she must have exited a vehicle near where she stood.

With that assumed, I considered it relevant that there wasn't an intersection near this stretch of highway. It meant that the hitchhiker's former driver could not have executed a turn, one that could have terminated the two parties' shared route. Whoever her previous driver was seemed to carry on west while simply leaving this west-traveling passenger behind.

As I neared the roadside woman, I speculated that maybe the hitchhiker and her former driver had parted in an unfriendly manner. It even crossed my mind that perhaps she was a hitchhiker or ridesharer who had just fended off an attack of some sort, maybe from an overly amorous male. It was this exact thought that was heavy on my conscience when I asked myself: "Should I stop or should I drive on?"

When I answered that question, I felt annoyed with myself. I wanted an uneventful day as I drove and, to that end, ignoring a stranded traveler seemed like the right thing to do.

Yet, at the moment of truth, I found that I simply wasn't able to abdicate my conscience. Instead, I half-heartedly eased off of the gas pedal when I neared the lone woman. I glanced at her as I slowly passed her and then I came to a complete stop about ten meters down the road from where she stood. When I glanced at her, her head had been stooped down to stare back at me and the look on her face was one of grave concern.

The woman was slender, I thought that she appeared to be about 21 years old, and she carried a large red backpack. I felt that she could only be feeling vulnerable given her predicament. Despite some annoyance with the situation, I resolved that I would act extra nice to her given that I was a stocky man in my late twenties.

I leaned over to the passenger-side window to lower it. When I did so, I looked at her reflection in the side door mirror as she approached the vehicle. At this point, I saw her pause. Then, in a few fleeting seconds, the young woman took a picture of my vehicle's rear with her cell phone's camera. She then strode forward to my open window.

"So where ya headed?" I asked her with a forced smile when she reached the open window.

"Where you headed?" she countered with a slight scowl.

After a short pause, I replied, "Vancouver Island."

With her lips pressed together, she opened the car door as though to enter. However, instead of getting in immediately, she first inspected the interior of the passenger-side door. With it swung open, she pushed the lock down and then tugged on the inside handle. After the lock popped back up, she began to remove her large backpack.

"Wudder you doing?" she asked curtly, her eyes wide like an owl's, as I reached down and pulled the trunk-release lever.

I paused, a bit stunned by what I interpreted as suspicion.

"Well I thought ya might put yer bag in the trunk," I replied.

She then pointed to the leg space in front of the seat.

"I'll keep it up here," she asserted while scrutinizing me.

I expected that she'd change her mind given how squashed the inside of the car would be. Regardless, before I could carry on down the highway I had to exit my vehicle to close the trunk.

After lifting it up and then slamming it shut I caught a glare from the hitchhiker, a paralyzing look that lasered through the back window of my car. Whatever she was thinking, she definitely meant business as her wide eyes focused on me. As a matter of instinct, I flashed my bare hands at my new passenger to make sure she could see that I wasn't holding anything. She did not reciprocate, as I could see that she had her left hand deep in her backpack.

I'd only known the hitchhiker for a minute, but it was clear that she wasn't sure whether or not I was helping her out of the goodness of my heart. Firstly, she'd snapped my license plate, perhaps to identify me if I assaulted her. Secondly, she'd assured herself that the door handle worked from the inside, possibly protecting herself against a planned trap. Lastly, she had carefully watched me as I'd closed my trunk, maybe out of fear that I was getting a weapon. If I wasn't mistaken, then the hitchhiker was concerned that I might have been out to harm her.

At first, my perception of what I considered to be overt suspicion was hard to accept: she was the one who had effectively asked for my help with the thumb-up signal on the side of the highway. Yet, I did realize that I had suspected, with basically no evidence, that her former driver had treated her poorly. It seemed that we, the hitchhiker and I, both had a prejudice against people who picked up hitchhikers.

I knew that many had associated the Yellowhead Highway in Western Canada with several cases of missing and/or murdered women, women who were last seen hitchhiking somewhere between the Rocky Mountains and Prince Rupert. Such were the numbers of these cases that writers, locals, and news agencies often referred to this stretch of the Yellowhead Highway as the "Highway of Tears." That I viewed myself as 'Mr. Nice Guy' while picking up a hitchhiker in this stretch of the highway without reflecting on how other people might see me was a mistake. In an attempt to appear friendly, I tried to initiate some small talk.

"Odd spot t' be at this time," I commented as I shoulder-checked, "with not much traffic."

"I had a ride earlier," the young woman quietly replied, confirming what I'd suspected.

I would have asked what ended her earlier ride but did not feel welcome to do so. In fact, the hitchhiker and I barely spoke on the road ahead, and I didn't even ask what her name was. Nor did I pester her about her destination as I assumed she would simply tell me when she wanted out of the car.

As I drove, I maintained a speed that was slower than the limit to avoid any chance of a fine. As a result, a few speeding vehicles passed us on the Yellowhead Highway before I turned south toward Valemount.

I noticed when these cars passed, that the hitchhiker paid close attention to each of them. It was only in these moments that the unpleasant vibe around her changed.

In one instance, the hitchhiker reached across the space between my chest and the steering wheel and gave the driver of a passing car a friendly peace sign. She behaved in a similar manner when two other vehicles passed us. The behavior would have seemed odd except that it lined up with my belief that she'd regarded me as a man who had questionable intentions.

"She wants to be seen," I thought to myself.

I decided that her hitchhiking method involved making sure her drivers knew that others had seen her in their cars. In this way, perhaps she probably thought that she could deter criminal acts by any so-inclined person who picked her up. Although her fears of me were unwarranted, I still felt that the young woman was being smart. Based on her knowledge of how dangerous hitchhiking could be, she'd evidently developed a method that, as far as I could see, would generally increase her survival chances as she took part in an often dangerous activity.

She might have been interesting to talk to if she hadn't been so quietly nervous. It was this palpable nervousness that started to bother me. As we drove toward Valemount, I secretly hoped that her journey in my vehicle would end in the short term.

But I had already resolved not to kick her out as I assumed her previous driver had. The same conscience that compelled me to stop for her would prevent me from sticking her roadside so long as I could tolerate the situation. Whether this was an admirable characteristic worthy of plaudits or merely me being the source of my own drama is debatable.

Maybe there’s no difference.

"I need a bathroom break real bad," she remarked when we were in the midst of Valemount's businesses.

I guessed from that admission that she would not be ending her trip with me in the small British Columbian town but would instead carry on. I further surmised that she was selling the urgency of her need for the bathroom so as to put the maximum pressure on me to cooperate.

I stopped at a gas station, one that had an adjoined restaurant, and parked in one of the outer-fueling stalls. Then I rolled down my window to take in some fresh air. On her way to the restroom, the hitchhiker, despite her claim that her need for the restroom pressed, ever-so-calmly interacted with three people.

As she spoke amidst the refueling vehicles, she again made her interpersonal interactions clear to me. For a few moments, she would face the person she was conversing with but, in the next few moments, she would turn her head a little and talk while looking at me.

With each of the three people she spoke to, the young woman communicated three points. To each, she stated that her name was Danielle; to each, she claimed that she was a hitchhiker heading to Vernon; and with each, she pointed at me, made judgmental eye contact with me, and stated that I was a driver who had picked her up.

The surface messages, I thought, were meant for the people she spoke to: her words contained clear information about her identity. While this information would help locate her if she went missing, I thought that there was a deeper message for me. After all, no one wants to end up on a missing person's website.

"I'm telling these people to remember your face," she seemed to be saying to me, "to remember your car. They know you might be the guy, that guy, and they know you were with me -- that you picked me up. If you dare harm me one of them will remember you."

When each person she spoke to glanced my way, I vouched for myself with a smile. But a feeling of horror grew in my throat when one bearded and middle-aged man in a blue cap returned both a grimace and rolled eyeballs that I felt reflected skeptical thought.

Moments later, with Danielle in the station, I observed this man's reflection in my mirrors. He walked around the rear of my car and casually glanced in the direction of my plate. He kept his back turned to me, but it looked like he entered some information into a cell phone.

In the context of my accidentally suspicious behavior, I could only wonder if the guy was hell-bent on heroism. I feared that, with an anonymous tip to the police, he might allege that he knew of a creep who had lured a helpless woman into his car near The Highway of Tears. That 'tip' could make someone with power and egregious discretion think that I might have been the man who lurked invisible to all -- all, except for the women who had disappeared in the area while hitchhiking.

Next, a sturdy 40-something-year-old woman walked out of the gas station's restaurant and approached my car. Her stride had such a determination to it that I prepared to be treated like Ted Bundy himself.

"So is Danielle rude to you too?" the woman asked with a smile that surprised me.

After a moment of confusion, I conjectured that this was the person who had dropped Danielle off on the side of the highway before I'd arrived on the scene back near Jasper. She must have observed us from a restaurant window. That she was a middle-aged woman refuted my earlier assumption of an overly amorous male motorist.

"She behaves a bit oddly," I confirmed with a nod. "How d'ya know 'er?"

"Well," she huffed, "I picked 'er up coming out of Jasper this mornin.' Bu' she almost bear-sprayed me when I reached into the armrest compartment for a piece of a gum! After that, I kicked her out straight away!"

She gave a nod that validated her decision and then left me alone with a wave of her hand. A moment later, I glanced at Danielle's backpack and noticed a bulge near the top of it.

When I ran my hand over this bulge it felt like it could have been a can of mosquito repellent. But I also knew that it must have been this object that her left hand was near when I'd returned from the trunk -- and I wasn't a mosquito.

Five minutes later, my ever-so-favorite person returned.

"Sorry fer taking so long, but I'm getting such a great connection here that I decided to touch base with some friends," she said while holding up her cell phone. "Can we pose fer a pic?"

I knew that declining would be tantamount to an admission of intent to kill. I had to cooperate in order to avoid a false accusation.

"Sure," I said unenthusiastically.

She then held her camera aloft while we both faced it, me through the driver-side window and her just outside of it. A few moments later, she held the phone square to my face. This action revealed that the picture of us was online at a popular social media website.

I could have left things alone, however, I had petty revenge on my mind. All of her unwarranted suspicions, even as I tried to do her a favor that she'd effectively asked for, had affronted me. I thought that I would burst her bubble with a reference to the picture of the back of my car, a picture she probably thought that she took on the lowdown as she approached my vehicle.

"I'm sure you already posted the pic of my plate," I snipped.

I stared at Danielle with the left side of my mouth turned downward. With bewildered eyes and clenched teeth, her head nodded a few millimeters, a minuscule confirmation that she had posted my plate online.

I shrugged my shoulders and chuckled.

"Rats!" I said sarcastically as I snapped my fingers in the air in front of me.

If she thought that she was operating below my radar, she no longer thought that and maybe that offended her. But I thought that she would sense my sarcasm and just get back in the car. Instead, Danielle glared at me for a few moments more. Next, she took a quick look at the highway and strode a few paces from me. During the next several moments, she kept her back turned and her arms folded across the top of her abdomen.

I began to think that part of her wanted to try her hitchhiking skills with another driver. When she retrieved her bag from the front seat, I took it as confirmation that she would do that. But, before I switched gears from 'P' to 'D', she opened the back door and placed her bag on the passenger-side backseat. It was an action that could only mean that she wanted leg space more than she wanted to be near her can of bear spray.

"Hey thanks," I said sarcastically.

She had a slight smile and squinted eyes as she put her seatbelt on.

After we started traveling again, we were both silent for a long time. But it was more of a comfortable silence than an awkward or tense one. In fact, my hitchhiker was so relaxed that she actually fell asleep for a bit. It would have been the perfect time to kill her, if I was so inclined.

When she woke up, Danielle acted softly toward me for the first time. She spoke openly about some of her fears when it came to people -- men and women alike -- who picked up hitchhikers. After she addressed this topic, I felt a little less insulted: part of what had bothered me must have been an incorrect belief that she'd treated me with suspicion only because I was a male.

During the balance of our time together, I learned that Danielle lived off of the small earnings of a coffee-shop barista. Her romantic interest, a woman named Cara, worked in Jasper at a hotel that stayed open year-round. They both took turns hitchhiking the route between Jasper and Vernon on their days off in hopes of keeping their relationship alive.

"Thanks pal," Danielle said pleasantly when she exited my car at a major junction in Kamloops.

That ended my direct association with her.

But, unfortunately, even after Danielle left, the maladjusted invisible lurker remained where he'd been since shortly after Jasper. I realized this and sped away in hopes of making an evening ferry bound for Vancouver Island. I had to be fast just in case his visible form picked Danielle up next and mutilated her.

For those that don't watch the crime shows or operate missing persons websites...

If the invisible lurker on the Yellowhead Highway did pick her up next, then she could start to decompose that Wednesday in a drainpipe. Eventually, someone would stop to take a leak there and spot her remains. After the public urinator’s interrogation, there would be pencil-behind-the-ear half-scientists later on who would try to determine the time of her death. The smarty-pants people would already have looked into who saw her last. One of these self-professed geniuses would raise his or her pointer finger into the air and say "Aha!" when he or she viewed Danielle's falsely incriminating social media posts.

"Why on Earth," he or she would say to another with quizzical eyebrows, "I say to you good fellow 'Why on Earth!' would the decedent -- as the last thing she ever did online -- have been so determined to post this man's license plate for all her friends and family to see?"

And then when the photos made the news the man from the gas station would re-enter my life...

"Oh yes! I saw her in Valemount with that creep! I'll say this about her for sure: she was behaving really oddly! I'll testify to that if you want!"

But -- and this was key -- if I got to the ferry quickly, then the time-stamped ferry receipt could prove exculpatory. There was a chance that the receipt could establish that I couldn't have been at the scene of the carrion feast at a time relevant to the investigation.

Some would hate me anyway but I knew there were some people with power that at least partly cared about justice. With such a person in mind, I contentedly risked a high fine to get that receipt stamped as quickly as possible.

"NO HITCH-HIKING PICKUP IS ILLEGAL," the roadside signs often said en route.

That seemed to give the police the authority to search the cars of Good Samaritans and serial killers alike. I left small pieces of my concern for the well-being of hitchhikers beside those signs until my concern for others was all gone.

"You shouldn't help anyone anymore," a very quiet and resigned voice said.

I figured that since it could be difficult, at times, to differentiate between someone who was trying to help another person and someone who was the scum of humanity, that I shouldn't be either. Whether this conclusion came from a voice of reason or from a whispering devil on my shoulder -- one that was placed" there by the man I invited into my life when I stopped to pick Danielle up -- remains a valid question.

Recommended Reading on the Topic of Ted Bundy

For a deeper dive into the real-life dangers of hitchhiking, check out this recommended book.

The Stranger Beside Me by Ann Rule is a gripping true crime masterpiece. As a former colleague of Ted Bundy, Rule unveils his chilling double life as a serial killer. With insider insights, she recounts his crimes, trials, and the haunting realization of his true nature. A must-read!

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

The Springfield Three: Was Graduation Night a Clue to Their Disappearance?

The Springfield Three: Was Graduation Night a Clue to Their Disappearance?


On Sunday, June 7th, 1992, three women—Sherrill Levitt, Suzanne "Suzie" Streeter, and Stacy McCall—vanished from a home in Springfield, Missouri, leaving behind one of America’s most enduring mysteries. Known as "The Springfield Three," their disappearance came just hours after Suzie and Stacy celebrated their high school graduation, a detail that has sparked speculation about whether the timing held deeper significance. The table below outlines their key details:

Name Age Gender Occupation/Status Last Seen Location Last Seen Date/Time
Sherrill Levitt

NamUS #MP345
47 Female Hairdresser Sherrill Levitt’s home at 1717 East Delmar Street, Springfield, MO Early hours of Sunday, June 7th, 1992
Suzanne "Suzie" Streeter (Sherrill’s daughter)

NamUS #MP3233
19 Female Recent high school graduate, worked at a cinema Sherrill Levitt’s home at 1717 East Delmar Street, Springfield, MO Early hours of Sunday, June 7th, 1992
Stacy McCall

NamUS #MP350
18 Female Recent high school graduate Sherrill Levitt’s home at 1717 East Delmar Street, Springfield, MO Early hours of Sunday, June 7th, 1992

This article delves into the case, exploring the events of that night and speculating on whether graduation night was more than a coincidence, a theory I propose that aligns with discussions in true crime communities.

A Night of Joy Cut Short

Graduation Festivities

Saturday, June 6th, 1992, marked a milestone for Suzie Streeter, 19, Sherrill Levitt’s daughter, and Stacy McCall, 18, who had both graduated from Kickapoo High School that day. The evening was filled with celebration as the two friends joined classmates at graduation parties. Sherrill, 47, a local hairdresser, stayed home, likely proud of her daughter Suzie’s achievement.

The Disappearance

By 2:00–3:00 a.m. on Sunday, June 7th, 1992, Suzie and Stacy arrived at Sherrill’s home at 1717 East Delmar Street after plans to stay elsewhere fell through. Sherrill’s last known contact was a phone call with a friend around 11:15 p.m. on Saturday, June 6th, 1992. By morning, all three women were gone, their purses, keys, and belongings left untouched in a house showing no signs of a struggle.

The Investigation: A Trail Gone Cold

An Eerie Crime Scene

When friends alerted police later on Sunday, June 7th, 1992, investigators found a clean scene. No forced entry, no blood, no fingerprints—just a broken porch light globe, later deemed unrelated. The family dog was agitated but unharmed, suggesting a swift, controlled abduction. Despite extensive searches and hundreds of tips, no physical evidence has ever conclusively pointed to a suspect.

Theories Without Answers

The case has spawned countless theories: a random predator, a local criminal element, or even a connection to Suzie’s past testimony in a vandalism case. A reported sighting of a green van near the house fueled speculation, but like other leads, it led nowhere. Decades later, the case remains unsolved, with no arrests or solid breakthroughs.

Could Graduation Night Hold the Key?

A Speculative Motive

One intriguing speculation, which I propose, is that the timing of the disappearance—on the night of Suzie and Stacy’s graduation on Saturday, June 6th, 1992—was not just a coincidence. Some true crime enthusiasts on forums like Reddit’s r/UnresolvedMysteries and Websleuths have similarly suggested that graduation, a symbol of triumph and transition, could have triggered a perpetrator with a personal grudge.

Along these lines, to disappear on graduation night might be poetic for someone looking to commit a crime at a perfect time. This theory posits that someone, perhaps feeling sidelined, saw the night as a chance to target the young women at a peak moment of joy. This idea, while unproven, resonates with those who believe the crime was emotionally driven.

The Symbolic Weight of the Night of June 6th-June 7th

High school graduations are laden with meaning. Sociologically, the night, in North American society, could be viewed as a rite of passage: closure of youth, celebration of accomplishment, and the start of adulthood. With a High School diploma in hand, someone can attempt to move on to bigger and better things.

In contrast, for someone harboring resentment, possibly from shared school years, this night could have represented everything they felt denied: acceptance, success, or belonging. For some people, the high school years are socially brutal. From this perspective, the disappearance of The Springfield Three, if it's correct to be understood as an act of some kind of revenge, might connect in some thematic ways to the high school shootings that plagued American society in the years that followed, starting with Columbine about seven years later. These crimes were often committed by high school students among the social outcasts in their schools.

Accordingly, Suzie and Stacy, as recent graduates, might have been symbolic targets for a vindictive person, their abduction a way to disrupt a time that would otherwise be happy for them. This speculation aligns with discussions in true crime podcasts like The Vanished, where listeners have raised ideas about the date’s significance, though no evidence confirms it.

Sherrill’s Role in the Theory

If Suzie and Stacy were the primary targets, Sherrill’s disappearance complicates the narrative. One possibility, discussed in online forums, is that she was an unintended victim—collateral damage as a witness in her own home. The undisturbed scene suggests the perpetrator acted quickly, possibly knowing the house’s layout, which could point to someone familiar with the victims. This idea remains speculative, as no suspect has been linked to such a motive.

Echoes in the True Crime Community

Shared Speculation

The notion that graduation night was significant is a topic in true crime circles, and I’m adding my own perspective to this discussion. On platforms like Reddit and Websleuths, enthusiasts often explore whether the crime felt personal, possibly tied to high school dynamics. I believe it’s important to clarify that the idea of graduation night as a deliberate choice is my own conjecture, though it echoes broader conversations about emotional motives in the case. While these discussions lack hard proof, they highlight a belief among some that the date wasn’t random.

Down and Out in the Canadian Rockies

A BLEAK GLIMPSE INTO RESORT TOWN LIFE FROM A WORKER'S PERSPECTIVE

Get your copy of this engaging ebook now

Available on Amazon for Kindle or as a physical copy

The Mysterious Disappearance of Lars Mittank: Unraveling the Varna Airport Enigma

The Mysterious Disappearance of Lars Mittank: Unraveling the Varna Airport Enigma

On July 8th, 2014 (Tuesday), Lars Joachim Mittank, a 28-year-old German tourist, vanished under bizarre circumstances near Varna Airport in Bulgaria. He left behind a mystery that continues to captivate and confound.

However, I think this is a case where some sense can be made. My explanation of what I think happened to Lars Mittank will involve an analysis of both known facts regarding the case and some assumptions that I will bring into the mix.

Lars Mittank: German on Vacation in Bulgaria

Lars Mittank was on vacation. I think that is very relevant to this missing persons case, a point that I will return to later.

But what began as a typical vacation with friends at the Golden Sands resort turned into one of the most perplexing missing persons cases of the modern era. This is thanks to enigmatic behavior that was caught on security footage that captured his final known moments. In a way, that makes this case similar to the Elisa Lam mystery from Los Angeles, another strange missing persons case from the 2nd decade of the current century.

Before Lars disappeared, he had been enjoying a week-long trip. This trip took a turn for the worse when he had one of those altercations at the bar involving a sports team debate. Reportedly, a football rivalry in a barroom setting led to a beating, and this beating was bad enough that it left him with a ruptured eardrum.

Personally, I had a major ear clog at one point in my life, one that lasted three weeks. I was advised not to swim and not to hike to a significantly high elevation until it cleared up. This was because diving underwater or going to high elevation causes changes in air pressure.

The ears are a major point in the body where changes in air pressure matter. If Lars had a ruptured eardrum, then flying was off the table for him, surely because the changes in pressure might have made his injury worse.

Advised against flying, he stayed behind as his friends returned to Germany. On Monday, July 7th, he checked into a hotel near the airport, where his behavior took a troubling turn.

He paced the halls, hid in an elevator, and made panic-driven phone calls to his mother. During these calls, he whispered that he felt threatened and unsafe.

His paranoia peaked on the morning of Tuesday, July 8th (the day he was set to fly home). At the airport, he visited a doctor for clearance but fled mid-appointment, abandoning his belongings. CCTV footage shows him sprinting across the grounds, scaling a fence, and disappearing into a field of sunflowers. To this day, he has never been seen again.

Below is the actual security footage capturing Lars Mittank’s final known moments as he flees Varna Airport:

The Infographics Show: Lars Mittank's Case Profiled

On April 9th, 2025, The Infographics Show published a list of haunting disappearances. They include the Lars Mittank disappearance. I embed the video below with starting points and stopping points that isolate only the Mittank disappearance (they covered multiple).

The footage of Lars was widely circulated online. This has made his case a focal point for amateur sleuths and true crime enthusiasts. The theories focus on mental health, medication side effects, foul play, and psychosis.

Despite extensive searches, no trace of him has surfaced. A reported sighting by a truck driver in Germany on an unspecified day in 2019 offered fleeting hope, but it led nowhere. That sighting would be about five years after the disappearance date, making it a really strange tip.

As of April 9th, 2025 (Wednesday), Lars remains missing, his fate a haunting enigma.

Detail Information
Full Name Lars Joachim Mittank
Date of Birth February 9th, 1986
Age at Disappearance 28
Nationality German
Last Seen July 8th, 2014 (Tuesday), Varna Airport, Bulgaria
Key Event Fled the airport on foot, captured on CCTV
Physical Description Approx. 5'11", slim build, short brown hair, male, caucasian, wearing yellow shirt and blue shorts.

Speculation on What Happened to Lars Mittank

I think the best explanation of what happened to Lars is simply that he suffered brain damage in the beating, which produced erratic behavior. It's known for sure he suffered a ruptured eardrum, so we aren't talking about a minor altercation. Furthermore, brain injuries are thought to cause paranoia, according to some medical experts. This refers to Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), damage from a blow to the head—like the beating Lars endured—which can disrupt brain function and trigger symptoms like paranoia or hallucinations, especially if areas near the ears, such as the temporal lobe, are affected.

Beatings between sports fans can be significant. There was a fan at a Major League Baseball game in 2011, Bryan Stow, who suffered brain damage over one of these affairs. His case has stayed in the news over the years, including an article for 2023. I think this ties in because simple sports-fan fights can still produce massive injuries.

Lars was not thought to be on drugs. Meanwhile, his medications, according to The Infographics Show, were not the kind that would commonly cause mental problems. I think that leaves the probabilities of what caused his behavior squarely having to do with the beating he suffered. The YouTube video does delve into this possibility a little bit.

Why Lars Mittank Has Not Been Found

The next question is one that I think most readers will remain perplexed by. Why has he not been found?

On that matter, I will return to the fact that he was a vacationer. Lars Mittank was not a Bulgarian but a German in Bulgaria.

In general, I think countries are less likely to spend public funds searching for missing tourists than their own nationals. I think this could happen in any country.

For example, I suspect something like this may have deflated the Elisa Lam case a little, as she was a Canadian who went missing in the USA. Furthermore, the case of Duncan MacPherson, a Canadian who went missing in Austria, is a striking example. The evidence basically showed that he was in a small area, but it would be over a decade before he would be found. With the MacPherson case, a cover-up, the exact opposite of an investigation, from the authorities has been suggested.

I don't think the police are overly motivated on most days. I think they will be less motivated looking for someone from a country that's not their own. Any excuse to deprioritize will look good to someone who has a budget to think of -- and all police forces have budgets to think of.

Furthermore, police searches fail quite a lot: plain and simple. I don't mean that they fail because the person isn't in the target area. Police searches fail quite a lot, even when they search the right area. If the search starts to get expensive, it gets called off -- it's that simple. Lots of missing people have been found after many years in an area that was supposedly scoured by searchers.

Most Likely Explanation: A Summary


Lars suffered a beating in the days before his disappearance. If he had some kind of hallucination or paranoia due to brain damage, then he probably had a desire to hide. Keeping in mind that he was fit and that mental problems don't limit you physically, he could, in fact, put himself in a really good hiding spot. He could also move quite a long distance on foot.

Quite frankly, he's likely in one of the wooded areas near where he was last seen, with the search complicated by police budgeting, animal scattering, and, presumably, the MP's own brain damage in the time frame leading up to his disappearance. This last point can't be ignored: someone who is suffering mentally but not physically could hide himself quite well.

Recent Missing Persons Cases: North America and Australia in Early 2025

In early 2025, gripping missing persons cases across North America and Australia have captured public attention, revealing tales of mystery, loss, and relentless searches for truth. This consolidation explores three unfolding stories—a California mother’s disappearance turned homicide, a Queensland woman’s remains identified after months of uncertainty, and an Ottawa man vanishing without a trace.

Mother’s Disappearance in California Reclassified as Homicide

On April 7th, 2025 (Monday), Fox News reported that Nikki Cheng Saelee-McCain, a 39-year-old mother of four from Shasta County, California, missing since May 17th, 2024 (Friday), is now the subject of a homicide investigation. Her sisters, Kaye Ford and Chloe Saelee, expressed their anguish to Fox News Digital, suspecting a cover-up after her last text on May 18th, 2024 (Saturday), and the discovery of her abandoned light pewter metallic 2002 Chevrolet Avalanche (California disabled plate DP154UT) on May 25th, 2024 (Saturday) in Tehama County.

Source: Fox News Coverage of Nikki Cheng Saelee-McCain’s Case

The Shasta County Sheriff's Office identified "persons of interest" by March 25th, 2025 (Tuesday), while her husband, Tyler McCain, previously charged with domestic violence in December 2023, spoke publicly on March 10th, 2025 (Monday), denying involvement. Her NamUs profile, created on July 4th, 2024 (Thursday), details her last contact—mentioning a hospital visit and driving her mother-in-law’s vehicle near Redding’s Win-River Casino—though this link will likely expire soon as NamUs is for missing persons, and her death is now confirmed. 

Nikki, at the time of writing, still had an active profile at NamUs.

Queensland Police Confirm Remains Belong to Missing Mother Tayla Spies

ABC Southern Queensland announced on April 7th, 2025 (Monday), that forensic testing confirmed remains found on April 4th, 2025 (Friday), in Noorindoo, 450 kilometers west of Brisbane, were those of Tayla Spies, last seen on February 2nd, 2025 (Sunday). Her white Toyota Hilux was located on April 3rd, 2025 (Thursday), prompting a search that ended with her remains discovered a kilometer away the following day.

A two-month effort involving police, community members, and State Emergency Service volunteers spanned 9,000 square kilometers after she was last spotted driving through Surat. Her sister Rebecca paid tribute online, noting Tayla was “loved more than she would ever know,” as police continue a post-mortem to determine her cause of death.

Source: ABC News Report on Tayla Spies’ Remains Discovery

Ottawa Police Search for Man Missing Since Saturday

The Ottawa Citizen reported on April 6th, 2025 (Sunday), that Ottawa police are seeking Waleed Amareen, a 49-year-old man last seen at 8 p.m. on April 5th, 2025 (Saturday), near Prince Albert Street in Ottawa’s east end. Described as bald, five feet eleven inches tall, and 180 pounds, he was wearing a black rain jacket, black toque, and grey slip-on shoes. The brief article underscores some urgency of the situation, though no further context about his disappearance was provided as of the last update on April 6th, 2025 (Sunday).

Source: Ottawa Citizen Alert on Waleed Amareen’s Disappearance

Abductions Caught on Video Tape: Missing Persons and Outcomes

AI-generated. Not a real image of an abduction.

By: Shane Lambert

What would you do if you’re walking home one night, like Carlesha Freeland-Gaither was, when a stranger suddenly grabs you from behind? You fight, but quickly realize that he is stronger than you, but in the corner of your eye, in the moment before you were abducted, you had seen a camera. You know that there is a chance that someone might care enough to come looking for you -- if only they see the footage.

Later, after being abducted, your mind races. You ask yourself if someone will figure out that you were on that street at that time and then realize they need the camera footage. You think about the people who care about you and their motivation for finding you. That effort, you know, is your best hope.

Most abductions are not caught on camera. Furthermore, some abductions, including one below involving a toddler, are hard to watch. That is not just about the subject matter, which can be disturbing, but it's about low video quality too.

Abductors aren't exactly posing for the camera, and security cameras, often with grainy footage, are not meant for Hollywood sets. Still, the rare abductions caught on videotape have given us a chilling window into the reality of people vanishing and how it happens.

Novelist George Orwell, writing in 1948, warned us of a dystopian future where cameras would be everywhere and we would have no privacy. It seems that the concept of "no privacy" is for better or worse. No one likes to feel the gaze of a camera, yet snippets of footage have become both a tool for justice and an educational reminder of how quickly someone can be taken away.

The "Privacy vs Justice" debate can be set aside for now. Let’s dive into some unforgettable footage, explore what they reveal about missing persons, and uncover why these videos stick with us long after the screen goes dark.

Solve the Unexplained Disappearances!

Discover Missing 411- A Sobering Coincidence by David Paulides. Uncover chilling tales of vanishings, from wilderness mysteries to cases like Nikki Saelee-McCain and Waleed Amareen. A must-read for true crime enthusiasts.

Get your copy now to explore the patterns behind these haunting stories!

Buy Now on Amazon!

As an Amazon Associate, the website host may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

The Night Carlesha Freeland-Gaither Fought Back

It was November 2nd, 2014, in Philadelphia’s Germantown neighborhood. Carlesha Freeland-Gaither, a 22-year-old nurse, was walking home when a man grabbed her off the street.

Surveillance footage captured the struggle. It showed Carlesha kicking, trying to signal for help, and clawing to break free as her abductor forced her into a gray Ford Taurus. The video, raw and unfiltered, is an example of the battle between abductor and abductee. 

With this case, there was a happy ending. The footage spread like wildfire online, sparking a city-wide manhunt.

Carlesha was found alive two days later on November 4th, 2014, in Maryland. Her abductor was tracked down thanks, in part, to the video’s rapid spread and the flood of tips it generated. The suspect, Delvin Barnes, was later sentenced to 35 years in prison (Philadelphia's NBC affiliate/July 4th, 2016). 

The Heart-Wrenching Case of Kamille "Cupcake" McKinney

Not every story ends in rescue. In October 2019, 3-year-old Kamille "Cupcake" McKinney was playing outside a birthday party in Birmingham, Alabama, when she vanished.

Security cameras caught a man luring her away with candy, and she appears happy to follow him. Not every abduction is about brute force. 

The footage, chilling in its simplicity, shows how quickly innocence can be stolen. Here it is, perhaps highlighting for the one millionth time the need for parents or guardians to ensure a close watch on their children:

The video galvanized a desperate search, but more than a week later, Kamille’s body was found in a landfill. Two suspects were charged, and the footage became a rallying cry for justice, a grim reminder of how vulnerable our youngest are.

Samantha Koenig: A Barista’s Final Shift

In Anchorage, Alaska, on February 1st, 2012, 18-year-old Samantha Koenig was closing up the coffee stand where she worked when a man approached. Security footage showed him forcing her out at gunpoint, her hands raised in surrender. The video, which is long and unsettling, captures her last moments before she vanished.

Samantha's abductor was Israel Keyes. He was a serial killer later linked to multiple murders. He killed Samantha and dumped her body in a frozen lake. He was caught after using her stolen debit card, but not before leaving a trail of devastation.

Why These Videos Go Viral, and Why They Matter

What is it about these abduction videos that grips us? Part of it is the raw, unfiltered truth they reveal. This isn't Hollywood, but nor is it so-called "Reality TV." It's a true cross-section of daily life where the subjects of the film are people of the community, unscripted.

We all know these things could happen to us or at least someone we know. Most of us, like Carlesha, might have walked down a street that made us feel uncomfortable. Some of us, like Samantha, have probably left a door unlocked at work. I think most parents will have taken their eyes off their children for a short time.

But there are also cases we don't know anything about because we have no videotape. So when we do have it, inferences can be drawn about what may have happened to other people. The videotape is more than just evidence for one crime; it's a clue as to how abductors work in a more general way.

What I Would Do If Facing Abduction

Watching these videos makes me wonder what I’d do if it were me. On this subject, experts vary on what they recommend.

I’ve read some say that you should cooperate with someone who is pointing a gun at you or carrying a weapon. But I’ve read others who said you should never go to the secondary scene.

There is a contradiction there, if you think about it. If someone with a gun is telling you to go to a secondary scene, do you go as ordered, or do you not go because going to the said place might be a bad move?

We have to admit that you might be done for either way. With that in mind, I would not go to the secondary scene. My thinking is that whatever the abductor had planned for me, he’s not comfortable doing that at the primary scene. That’s why he wants to lead me away. 

However, perhaps what I'm thinking right now is irrelevant. I do realize that fear might just take over, and the thoughts I’m having as I write from the safety of my living room won’t be the same ones I have in the moment of truth.

But if they were, I would just face my fate at the primary scene instead of going who knows where. Not only is there a chance that the move will throw the abductor a curveball, but if I'm dead either way, I'd rather the evidence of my disappearance be tied to a known location of mine than somewhere random.

What Can We Do

Next time you see one of these clips online, don’t just scroll past. Watch it and share it. There's more meaning in that than in sharing the videos of the goofballs online with their antics.

What Happened to DB Cooper on November 24th, 1971? Top Scenario Explained!

By: Shane Lambert

The D.B. Cooper plane hijacking is a legendary unsolved mystery. The name is a false one given to a man who hijacked a plane in late November 1971. To this day, his identity remains unknown, and the debate regarding who he was has been alive for years.

In this article, I am changing perspectives a little. I'm not looking to find out what D.B. Cooper's real name was. Instead, I want to review what I think happened to Cooper on the night of the hijacking.

On this matter, I think one theory stands out as both simple and plausible: Cooper parachuted into the Columbia River or a tributary and met his end there. This is a previously supported theory, including with FBI agents.

The FBI artist rendering of the so-called D.B. Cooper

Review of the Events of November 24th, 1971: D.B. Cooper Hijacks a Plane

On November 24th, 1971, a man calling himself "Dan Cooper" boarded Northwest Orient Airlines Flight 305. This flight was bound from Portland, Oregon, to Seattle, Washington, making it a short flight. Middle-aged, clad in a suit, and carrying a briefcase, he seemed like an ordinary airline customer. He stayed that way until he passed a note to a flight attendant claiming that he had a bomb.

At this point, Cooper demanded $200,000 in cash (worth about $1.5 million in 2025's terms). He also had an odd request: four parachutes in addition to the money.

Polite yet firm, Cooper showed wires and a battery which may only ostensibly have been connected to a bomb. But the crew took a "better safe than sorry" approach, and the plane landed in Seattle. At this point, the FBI delivered the ransom in 20-dollar bills. Importantly, these bills were serial-numbered. The FBI also included the parachutes, and Cooper released the 36 passengers but retained the crew on board.

He then directed the pilots to fly toward Mexico City, below 10,000 feet, with landing gear down and flaps at 15 degrees. Between 8:00 and 8:13 p.m., over southwestern Washington’s rugged terrain, Cooper lowered the rear airstair and leapt into the stormy night, the money tied to his waist. The crew felt a jolt but didn’t see him go. He vanished into that night and has not been seen since.

The Search for the Hijacker Failed

The FBI’s NORJAK investigation scoured the Pacific Northwest, but they found nothing in the immediate aftermath of the hijacking. It wasn't until 1980 that a lead developed when $5,800 of the cash surfaced on the Columbia River’s Tena Bar. This money was unearthed by a boy.

Despite 1,000+ suspects, Cooper’s fate remains unknown. Maybe you could say that his fate remains unknown because there were 1000+ suspects. The FBI having that many 'leads' to go through can only obfuscate matters. This unsolved U.S. skyjacking, regarding a man misnamed "D.B. Cooper," continues to captivate. It is the only American hijacking that remains unsolved.


Timeline of Key Events in the D.B. Cooper Hijacking

Date Time (PT) Event
November 24, 1971 2:50 p.m. Northwest Orient Airlines Flight 305 departs Portland International Airport (PDX) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac), with "Dan Cooper" on board.
November 24, 1971 ~3:00 p.m. Cooper passes a note to a flight attendant claiming he has a bomb, beginning the hijacking.
November 24, 1971 ~3:20 p.m. Flight 305 lands in Seattle. Cooper demands $200,000, four parachutes, and releases the 36 passengers after receiving the ransom and parachutes, keeping the crew on board.
November 24, 1971 7:36 p.m. Flight 305 takes off from Seattle, heading toward Reno, Nevada, as part of Cooper’s demand to fly to Mexico City, with specific flight instructions (below 10,000 feet, landing gear down, flaps at 15 degrees).
November 24, 1971 8:00–8:13 p.m. Cooper jumps from the rear airstair of the Boeing 727 over southwestern Washington, near the Lewis River, with the money tied to his waist. The crew feels a pressure bump at 8:13 p.m., marking his likely exit.
February 10, 1980 Daytime 8-year-old Brian Ingram discovers $5,800 of Cooper’s ransom money buried at Tena Bar on the Columbia River’s north bank near Vancouver, Washington, the only physical evidence ever recovered.

The Columbia River: Features and Characteristics

I've hiked near the Columbia River at a couple of different spots, Invermere and Revelstoke. This river is one of North America’s mightiest waterways. Stretching over 1,200 miles from its source to the Pacific Ocean, it’s the largest river flowing directly into the Pacific from the western hemisphere, keeping in mind that the Fraser River, though bigger, empties into the Salish Sea.

The Columbia River's exact source is Columbia Lake, at 2,690 feet above sea level, in the Columbia Valley near Invermere, British Columbia. This is a serene and marshy area nestled between the Rocky and Purcell Mountains.

From there, it flows northwest through British Columbia, passing Revelstoke, BC. It later flows south and west through Washington and Oregon, draining a 258,000-square-mile basin. In the area near Cooper’s jump point, in southwestern Washington, the Columbia River is wide, deep, and fast-moving. The river, which terminates at the Pacific Ocean near Astoria, has depths reaching up to 124 feet and currents that can sweep objects far downstream. Its cold waters, fed by snowmelt and rain, carry a massive volume, averaging 265,000 cubic feet per second. The river’s bed is a tangle of sediment, logs, and rocks.

In late November, when Cooper jumped, the Columbia would have been a formidable force. Swollen by autumn rains and early snowmelt, its flow surges and was about 308,000 cubic feet per second in the region near the suspected drop zone (yes, I looked: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv?site_no=14105700).

Water temperatures drop to around 40°F (4-5°C), and that would pose an immediate hypothermia risk to anyone submerged. The river’s surface can be choppy, whipped by seasonal storms and winds gusting through the rugged terrain. On November 24th, 1971, a storm battered the area, amplifying the river’s power and darkness, making survival unlikely for an unprepared parachutist landing in its grasp.

Source consulted for this section: Northwest Power and Conservation Council 

Dive into Mysteries with the Ultimate Kindle!

Experience the Kindle Paperwhite Signature Edition—our fastest ever with a 7” glare-free display, 25% faster page turns, and 32 GB storage. Auto-adjusting light, wireless charging option, and waterproof design make it perfect for reading D.B. Cooper’s tale anywhere!

Enjoy 12 weeks of battery life and access to millions of titles, including Kindle Unlimited bestsellers—escape distraction-free today!

Buy Now on Amazon!

As an Amazon Associate, the website host may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Cooper's Likely Drop Zone: Map Coordinates of Relevant Places

While Flight 305 started its journey from Portland to Seattle, that leg is now backstory. Cooper’s real move came after the plane took off from Seattle at 7:36 p.m. (all times PT), heading toward Reno, Nevada, as part of his broader demand to reach Mexico City.

He jumped during this Seattle-to-Reno leg, between 8:00 and 8:13 p.m., over southwestern Washington. Though he instructed the crew to fly to Mexico City, Reno was the immediate refueling stop, making it the relevant destination for pinpointing his exit.

The table below maps this critical leg, alongside key related locations, with coordinates linking to Google Maps for a visual of where his fate likely unfolded. The coordinates are not necessarily exact, but will give readers a good indicator of the relevant areas.

Location Description Google Maps Coordinates
Plane Originated Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac), Seattle, WA - Departed for Reno 47.4502°N, 122.3088°W
Plane Destination Reno-Tahoe International Airport, Reno, NV - Where the plane was headed from Seattle 39.4991°N, 119.7681°W
Tena Bar Columbia River shore near Vancouver, WA - Where $5,800 of ransom was found 45.7180°N, 122.7580°W
Estimated Drop Zone Near Lewis River, southeast of Ariel, WA - Likely spot of Cooper’s jump 45.9667°N, 122.3167°W

The drop zone’s coordinates must be treated as broad rather than precise due to the plane’s speed and the 13-minute jump window. There are all kinds of factors, like wind and the weight of the plane, that could affect the vessel's trajectory. Notably, the plane was empty of passengers, carrying only Cooper and the crew after the 36 passengers were released in Seattle. This lighter load could have allowed the plane to fly faster than typical Seattle-to-Reno routes, which often carry full passenger loads and luggage.

A lighter aircraft reduces drag and fuel burn, potentially increasing speed beyond known averages. The variable speed, combined with the jump window and wind, makes the drop zone a broad estimate. While the other Google Maps coordinates are for exact spots, the drop zone is nowhere near exact.

Down and Out in the Canadian Rockies

A BLEAK GLIMPSE INTO RESORT TOWN LIFE FROM A WORKER'S PERSPECTIVE

Get your copy of this engaging ebook now

Available on Amazon for Kindle or as a physical copy

Tena Bar: The Place Where the Money Was Found in 1980

Tena Bar, where $5,800 of Cooper’s ransom money was found in 1980, is a sandy stretch on the Columbia River’s north bank near Vancouver, Washington, roughly 20 miles southwest of the estimated drop zone. On February 10th, 1980, 8-year-old Brian Ingram discovered the weathered $20 bills while digging at Tena Bar during a family camping trip. This was reported by The Oregonian and confirmed in a 2008 interview with Ingram. 

Readers should recall at this point that the FBI documented the serial numbers of the ransom money. The FBI’s NORJAK investigation verified that the serial numbers matched Cooper’s ransom, documenting the find in their public vault (vault.fbi.gov), often misspelling the site as “Tina Bar.”

The location, near the Fazio Brothers sand operation, was mapped at approximately 45.7180°N, 122.7580°W. In 2011, the Citizen Sleuths team, led by geologist Tom Kaye, analyzed the money’s condition and sediment at Tena Bar, confirming the site via GPS (citizensleuths.com). Their findings suggested the bills were deposited naturally by the river, supporting the theory that Cooper’s remains and money drifted downstream from the Lewis River area to the Columbia, where Tena Bar captured a small fraction of the loot.

If Cooper Went in the River, He Could be There a Very Long Time

How did the money get into the river? One way it could happen is if Cooper parachuted into the river himself with the money affixed to his waist.

After he drowns, currents would rip the money away from his body for sure. River currents and ocean currents will dismember a body if given the time. The river current would weaken whatever bonds Cooper used to secure the money, without any problem.

Conversely, the money could have fallen off Cooper as he parachuted. But here is why I treat this as a lesser scenario.

Firstly, if Cooper's losing his money, then that can only be taken to mean he is under duress. There's no way a ransomer lets his haul go unless it's absolutely necessary. This suggests a problematic parachute jump. If he didn't land in water, then you would think he would have been found in the land terrain, given the scale of the search and how much time has passed since November 1971.

But I think Cooper would have affixed the money to his waist incredibly securely before jumping. It's just something he is not going to be frivolous about: where the money goes, Cooper goes.

For me, the location of the money in the Columbia River means Cooper landed there with it, or he landed in a tributary. I would say that he was more likely to land in the Columbia just because of its size. Thus, my top guess as to Cooper's fate is simply that he parachuted into the river, upstream where the money was found.

How AI thinks it happened. 😂

People Lost in Rivers Can Stay Lost for Ages

There are a lot of missing people cases where someone known to have fallen into a river has stayed lost for decades and decades. Whatever rivers do to people who drown in them, they hide the remains well.

Remember that the money that D.B. Cooper lost was only found by the random digging of a child. It was not sticking out of the sand in an obvious way. Accordingly, it would not be surprising if D.B. Cooper is buried under river sediment and maybe even under water.

He could effectively be lost for all time or only likely to be found through a random event. That is especially the case since his case was deprioritized by the FBI in July 2016.

I think those looking for a satisfying answer to the mystery of what happened to him that night will simply have to take satisfaction in probabilities. If you accept that there's no way a ransomer is going to part with his money easily, then I think the balance of probabilities supports that Cooper's fate is tied to the same river or river network that the money was found in. He probably drowned because the money tied to his waist was found on the shores of a river.


Famous Cases: Who Was Jack the Ripper? MPC's Top Theory

By: Shane Lambert

I will work on a series in the time frame ahead that I will tag/label "Famous Historical Cases." This will be a tangent away from missing persons cases for a little bit. I do it because I'm sure the readers of my blog enjoy historical cases and are fans of true crime in general, not just missing people cases.

To start the series, I will look at the case of Jack the Ripper, the infamous and unsolved serial killer case from the late 19th century. In doing so, I presume the reader has at least some general knowledge of the case from the 1880s in England. My position is that Charles Lechmere should be considered the leading suspect.


Charles Lechmere: The Leading Suspect in the Jack the Ripper Case

Charles Lechmere stands as the strongest suspect in the Jack the Ripper case, holding a clear edge over all other top 'contenders' due to his undeniable presence at one of the crime scenes.

My position certainly isn't unique: Lechmere has gained massive traction among Ripperologists since the 2014 documentary, Jack the Ripper: The Missing Evidence, which featured Christer Holmgren's research into the case.

The revelations from that documentary were perhaps a long time coming. In fact, that someone did not point out the things that were pointed out in 2014 completely discredits the so-called Ripper pundits from times beforehand.

I recommend watching the YouTube video below (embedding good as of April 1st, 2025). I will say that there are some uncritical elements but that it's still great food for thought on the unsolved mystery of Jack the Ripper's real name.

Recommended Reading on Jack the Ripper

For a deeper dive into the Jack the Ripper case, explore The Complete History of Jack the Ripper by Philip Sugden.

Note a 4.6 out of 5.0 review score as of June 16th, 2025. This definitive book offers a detailed, research-driven account, dispelling myths with primary sources and shedding light on the victims and Victorian London. A must-read for true crime fans!

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Lechmere’s Undeniable Crime Scene Connection

On August 31st, 1888, Lechmere supposedly discovered Mary Ann Nichols’ body in Buck’s Row. Her throat had been slashed, her abdomen mutilated, and she was still warm as though it was moments after her death.

Unlike any other suspect, Charles Lechmere was physically there, alone with the corpse before Robert Paul, second on the scene, arrived. Lechmere quickly positioned himself as a witness as opposed to the perpetrator.

But his direct link to a crime scene and murder victim that is attributed to Jack the Ripper is something no one else has claimed or proven concerning any of the other suspects. As shown in the documentary from 2014, Charles Lechmere gave the name "Charles Cross." His link to the crime scene appeared in newspapers at the time, as per the September 3rd, 1888 Evening Telegraph below.

Charles Cross would later be shown to be Charles Lechmere.

Accordingly, Lechmere's link to a crime scene isn’t speculation or hindsight: it is a documented fact from the inquest. Furthermore, it is something that modern researchers can double-check. That's an important point because some of the arguments in favor of other 'suspects' lack this criterion.

I can (and did) go into newspaper archives and look for the articles from that time that report Lechmere's association (ie, Cross' association) with one of the crime scenes. That gives him a tangible advantage over the likes of Aaron Kosminski, Montague John Druitt, or Walter Sickert. Compared to Lechmere, theories regarding these other individuals are built on the proverbial house of cards.

Circumstantial Evidence Strengthening Lechmere’s Case

Other aspects of Lechmere's involvement are, in fact, more tenuous. They are covered in the 2014 documentary mentioned earlier, which I will review.

His daily route from 22 Doveton Street, Bethnal Green, to Pickfords in Broad Street ran through Whitechapel, brushing past murder sites like Hanbury Street (Annie Chapman) and Mitre Square (Catherine Eddowes).

Lechmere's mother’s residence near Berner Street (Elizabeth Stride) ties him to four of the five canonical killings. Add his job as a carman hauling meat, handling knives and blood daily, and his early-morning schedule, and the fit starts to look right. He has a cover and a reason to be in public with blood on him.

Then there’s his inquest oddities: using “Charles Cross” instead of Lechmere, contradicting Paul’s account, and downplaying Nichols’ injuries to police. Paul's account should be considered more credible based on the fact that he actually gave his real name. These circumstances aren’t proof of guilt, but they’re red flags no other suspect carries with such immediacy.

Aaron Kosminski’s Flimsy Case Without DNA

Contrast this with Aaron Kosminski, whose case crumbles without its flimsy DNA crutch. The 2014 study by Jari Louhelainen and Russell Edwards claimed mitochondrial DNA from a dubious shawl linked Kosminski to a murder victim, Catherine Eddowes.

But the shawl’s provenance is unproven, and no 1888 record ties it to a crime scene. It could be pointed out that contamination over a century could have taken place, but I don't think there is a need to go there, because the authors stonewalled scrutiny. In doing so, they forfeited their right to be taken seriously.

It is a scientific standard to share raw data. If they had a smoking gun and wanted to be regarded as credible, then they couldn't guard the research that led to their conclusion.

Some experts didn't like their research for poor science (Science.org/Mar 15, 2019/David Adam). This makes the claim that Kosminski is tied to a crime scene nothing more than a narrative.

“Walther Parson, a forensic scientist at the Institute of Legal Medicine at Innsbruck Medical University in Austria, says mitochondrial DNA sequences pose no risk to privacy and the authors should have included them in the paper. 'Otherwise the reader cannot judge the result. I wonder where science and research are going when we start to avoid showing results but instead present colored boxes.'”

Without a direct tie, Kosminski’s case is vapor: he is a weirdo and nothing more. There are loads of odd people in alleys and late-night streets in any city. You don't need expertise to realize that, just some life experience.

Modern Policing Supports Lechmere’s Suspicion

Modern policing bolsters the suspicion around Lechmere in more ways than one. Yes, today, the body-finder is Suspect One until cleared, and Lechmere’s story wouldn’t pass muster without alibi checks or forensic scrutiny, tools absent in 1888. Other points of view on modern police work are relevant as well.

For instance, what would it mean in modern police work if someone tried to evade identity? On this matter, I will digress to some personal experience I have.

I actually work with identity evaders all the time in my profession, which is night-time hotel work that includes security duties. People causing a ruckus in public areas of the hotel at 3AM or thereabouts often refuse to give their room numbers, refuse to give ID, or give room numbers that do not exist. I have no doubt it's an effort to avoid any punishments (such as eviction) associated with their minor crimes.

Such people who evade identification are always guilty of some kind of offense on hotel property, albeit minor offenses. But I will say that someone who attempts to evade identification is a very suspicious character in a hotel. I am basing this on my own work experience with the 3AM disturbing-the-peace types.

When someone doesn't give their room number or ID, I follow their footsteps on camera to their room number and flag the room for all staff to be aware of. Conversely, someone who gives ID or a correct room number is usually just given a casual verbal warning. In short, not identifying yourself has the opposite effect of the one that the person intends. They face greater scrutiny, not lesser.

Police Would Be Highly Suspicious of Identity Misrepresentation

In more serious contexts, police aren't fans of people using aliases. In modern police work, Lechmere's evading identity would be taken to mean he has something to hide. In modern times, police would think that he might have a criminal record, warrants, or be evading follow-up investigations.

In fact, something like this happened concerning Ted Bundy, the American serial killer. He was pulled over for a traffic violation in Florida while on the lam. He gave a misleading name and once that was discovered, there was no way police were letting him go. Bundy would never see freedom again.

Giving anything except your incontrovertible legal name could be construed as obstruction of justice. In modern police work, that could lead to a lot, such as home searches, interrogations, and penetrating investigations. If you found a body and gave an alias to the police, they would be all over you in modern times, as police tactics on these matters have evolved for the better over the last several decades.

Kosminski is the Popular Top Pick is Total Garbage

Lechmere would be under a microscope in modern times. But as far as Kosminski goes, modern police would not likely elevate his status higher than "person of interest."

His lunacy and hatred for women would be major red flags, especially since he had contempt for prostitutes. But without anything against him tying him to a crime scene, he would not be elevated to a suspect, I'm sure. If he were put to trial, I'm sure the result would likely be Not Guilty, especially if Lechmere's more convincing candidacy as the top suspect was raised in defense.

In conclusion, the only person who can be considered a suspect is Lechmere. Everyone else is either a person of interest at best or someone who was more or less arbitrarily suggested (there are scores of Ripper 'suspects' noted in crime writing).

In conclusion, I would say Lechmere is the top suspect, and that any other suggested figure is an incredibly distant No. 2.

Featured Post

Missing Person: Lisa Marie Knight - Ossineke, Michigan 2012 Disappearance

Missing Person : Lisa Marie Knight ...

Best of MPC (as selected by the site's author)