Showing posts with label Woman in the well. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Woman in the well. Show all posts

Interpol’s Breakthrough: Solving the "Woman in the Chicken Coop" Cold Case

The Woman in the Chicken Coop Identified

By: Shane Lambert
March 20th, 2025

This article is part of a short-term series where I do deep dives at some solved cases to see the circumstances. Click on the label "Deep Dive at a Solved Case" to see other similar articles.

A promising breakthrough emerged in Interpol’s "Identify Me" campaign on Thursday, March 20th, 2025. This campaign, designed to identify missing people across international borders, cracked a haunting cold case. Detailed in a CBS article titled "Transcontinental cold case solved as victim dubbed 'woman in the chicken coop' is identified," the story reveals a long-awaited resolution.

Breakthrough in the Case

A Paraguayan woman, once a Jane Doe known only as "the woman in the chicken coop," has been identified as Ainoha Izaga Ibieta Lima, aged 33. Found hanged on a farm in Girona, Spain, in August 2018, her death remains a mystery—was it suicide or murder? The CBS report leaves it unclear.

Locals couldn’t identify her, and without ID, she stumped authorities for years. Then, a 2019 missing persons report from her brother became the key. Today, her family faces a bittersweet moment: closure, yet sorrow.

Farm setting related to cold case
Not the actual setting. Use for likeness purposes only.

Who is Interpol and What is the "Identify Me" Campaign?

Interpol, or the International Criminal Police Organization, is a global powerhouse founded in 1923. Based in Lyon, France, it unites 195 member countries to tackle cross-border crime.

Its "Identify Me" campaign, launched in 2023, focuses on over 40 unidentified women found dead in Europe. By tapping public appeals and forensic archives, it’s cracking cold cases like this one.

Down and Out in the Canadian Rockies

A BLEAK GLIMPSE INTO RESORT TOWN LIFE FROM A WORKER'S PERSPECTIVE

Get your copy of this engaging ebook now

Available on Amazon for Kindle or as a physical copy

Why Fingerprints Still Matter

This breakthrough hinged on fingerprints, not DNA—a nod to the enduring power of traditional forensics. Spanish authorities supplied prints that Paraguay matched to their records.

Since the late 19th century, fingerprints have been a cornerstone of police work. This case proves they’re still vital when DNA isn’t an option.

Historical Echoes and Similar Cold Cases

I searched for "woman in the chicken coop" predating this news. No digital hits emerged—perhaps it was a local or Spanish nickname lost to my English keywords.

It echoes other Jane Doe monikers, like Saskatoon’s "The Lady in the Well" (murdered in 2006, dead since the 1920s—see my clue!). Interpol’s campaign also names victims by circumstance: "the woman with the flower tattoo" or "the woman in the canal."

What's Next?

This solved cold case is a win for Interpol’s "Identify Me" effort, but many mysteries remain. What do you think—could old-school forensics crack more cases? Share your thoughts below!

Unraveling the Mystery of Saskatoon’s Woman in the Well - Is She Agnes Goodall Pearson, Missing Since 1922 and Thought to Be in Saskatoon?

Author: Shane Lambert
Original Time of Writing: January 3rd, 2021; updated February 18th, 2021; updated October 15th, 2024. All articles are subject to editing after the original posting.

I spent several hours working on the case of Saskatoon's "Woman in the Well" on January 3rd, 2021. This was a woman who was found in a long-abandoned well in 2006, and at that time, she was believed to have been long dead. There was a hotel at the site of this well, known as the Shore Hotel, in decades past.

Mon, Dec 16, 1912 – 69 · Star-Phoenix (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada) · Newspapers.com

Researching the Shore Hotel generated some names affiliated with the property and even some real-estate news from nearly one hundred years ago. However, while researching the hotel I didn't find anything of interest that connected to this case so I took a different angle on it, an angle that may have yielded something. Firstly, here are the Lady in the Well's specifications.

Unidentified Remains: Saskatoon Jane Doe, the so-called "Lady in the Well" or "Woman in the Well"; reference number 2012020100 with Service Canada's Missing.
Remains found: June 29th, 2006
Date of death: This Jane Doe's date of death is not clear but she is unequivocally believed to have been dead for decades at the time of her discovery; a range is given from 1920 to 1924 in an article that appeared in Victoria's Times Colonist on March 9th, 2007 (immediately below). Others have given different ranges. For my research purposes, I decided that any missing person from pre-1935 would be in play.

https://www.services.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/missing-disparus/case-dossier.jsf?case=2012020100&id=4
https://www.services.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/missing-disparus/case-dossier.jsf?case=2012020100&id=4 Fri, Mar 9, 2007 – 1 · Times Colonist (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada) · Newspapers.com

Ethnicity/Race: White
Sex: Female
Age at time of disappearance: Estimated to be 20 years old to 35 years old
Hair: Brown
Height and weight at the time of disappearance: 5'0" and slim build
Clothing: as pictured below

Forensic work circulated with this case.

The Jane Doe, by contemporary analysis, is considered to have been at least middle-classed in life (she had a gold chain). That is important because sad as it may be, it's a fact of life that the more money your family has the more likely you are to be on the radar when you go missing. I think that's a universal truth and not just for contemporary society.

That the Saskatoon Jane Doe was not a transient was something I considered to be a clue: whoever she was, if she was from the Saskatoon area then there should have been some media coverage of her disappearance in the Saskatoon newspapers around the 1920's. With that in mind, I assumed that any missing person cases from 1910 to 1930 for the Saskatoon area might have been picked over and examined already, at least cases that there are surviving records of.

My assumptions and research led me to think that the Jane Doe simply wasn't a local. Sutherland, the area near Saskatoon where she was found, was a railway stop according to Jeff O'Brien, a man cited as an archivist in an article I read and someone that I have exchanged emails with regarding the Jane Doe (same article as the one snipped below). He pointed out that she could easily have been "anybody riding the rails" in a newspaper article that appeared back in 2006.

Sat, Jul 22, 2006 – 4 · Star-Phoenix (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada) · Newspapers.com

Cases involving Jane Does that were "riding the rails" a hundred years ago or so is actually something I have experience researching. I actually did some work on a similar case a few years ago. If you are interested in the Lady in the Well from Saskatoon, you might also take interest in the Rahway Jane Doe. She wasn't found in a well several decades after her death but rather she was found in the street the night after her murder. She was thought to have alighted a train in the minutes or hour preceding her death. Like Saskatoon's Lady in the Well, the Rahway Jane Doe remains unnamed.

Lady in the Well: A Traveller to Saskatoon?


When I decided, for the sake of proceeding in a guided way, to assume that The Lady in the Well was someone who didn't come from Saskatoon, I next decided to look for a presumptive person who looked for her. I assumed that the Lady in the Well, the Saskatoon Jane Doe, would have had relatives after her death who would have wondered what became of her.

On this matter, I discovered one "Mrs. A.G. Mcintosh" who was of 4644 Bader Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio in 1938. Mrs. A.G. Mcintosh was also named Isabelle Pearson, someone who appeared in the American census of 1940. A.G. Mcintosh was Isabelle''s husband and the sister of one Agnes Goodall Pearson. It is this latter name that probably belongs to the Jane Doe in Saskatoon, in my opinion. It seems that Isabelle Pearson identified herself under her husband's name (ie. "Mrs. A.G. Mcintosh"), which some wives used to do.

My Procedure for Finding a Potential Match to the Jane Doe


One way people looked for people they lost touch with in the past was through classified ads. I've worked on so many hundreds of missing person cases, either individually or at Websleuths.com, that I know the keywords that appear in classified ads when someone is looking for someone. Phrases like "the whereabouts of" or "anyone knowing" or "anyone with information" or "missing since [year]" are examples of common phrases that appear verbatim in countless classified ads where the poster is looking for someone who is missing. They are not as popular anymore but these kinds of classified ads often appeared under "Missing Persons" columns in the past.

In looking through old classifieds, I started with "missing since 1910" and then explored the hits that came up. Finding nothing I went to "missing since 1911" and so on and so forth -- always with a focus on classified advertisements that appeared in Saskatoon. I would have considered classifieds for Calgary, Winnipeg, Regina, and Edmonton too. Most of the hits were of missing men, especially in the WWI years.

Finally, "missing since 1922" hit something that remains promising. The Lady in the Well might be named Agnes Goodall Pearson. I plugged that name into Google and didn't find any identical previous guess of her name, so I think this is an original guess. Since the original publication of this article, her name has been mentioned in some forums but with links back to me.

A classified advertisement appeared in Saskatoon's Star Phoenix on August 9th, 1938 but the individual who placed the ad, Mrs. A.G. McIntosh of Cleveland, Ohio (ie. Isabelle Pearson), was looking for someone who went missing 16 years earlier -- so in 1922. I will note that 1922 is dead-smack in the middle of the 1920 to 1924 range that was given as the possible year of the Jane Doe's death.

Tue, Aug 9, 1938 – 14 · Star-Phoenix (Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada) · Newspapers.com


Missing person as of August 1938: Agnes Goodall Pearson
Last seen or last contact: sometime in 1922
Age at time of last contact or last seen: about 52 years old (born about 1870)

I will note that the age of the missing person doesn't match up with the estimated age of the Jane Doe. This is a point that has to be dealt with.

The Jane Doe is estimated to be 20 to 35 years old while Agnes was about 52 years old when she went missing. However, age estimates can be way off for Janes Does -- even ones that are found deceased for only a short time. When it comes to the long-deceased, one might think that the estimation process just gets all the more difficult.

I don't think Agnes' age of "about 52" rules her out as this Jane Doe at all. The Lady in the Well was found in an environment that was different than where most human remains are found and she was there for decades and decades. I think that those who gave an age estimate for this Jane Doe were working with facts surrounding her remains that were unique to their careers. Accordingly, I don't know how accurate their guesses are going to be.

One thing that I found interesting about the classified advertisement was that the person who posted it was from Cleveland, Ohio. The advertisement only appears in Saskatoon's Star Phoenix by my efforts. What that makes me think is that Mrs. A.G. McIntosh of Cleveland had reason to believe that Agnes Goodall Pearson went missing in Saskatoon, not further east nor further west. Someone from Cleveland, Ohio wouldn't advertise a classified for a missing person in Saskatoon without good reason.

I have very good reason to believe that the person who placed the advertisement was actually named Isabelle McIntosh. She appears in the 1940 United States Federal Census with the matching address of 4644 Bader Avenue (Bader Avenue can be seen in the original source, below is just a snippet). 

Her husband was named Andrew McIntosh (in fact, he was Andrew Grieve McIntosh). Thus, the "Mrs. A.G. McIntosh" in the classified advertisement from 1938 is the wife of the household. She is writing in her husband's name as many married women used to do.


Here's what I know of Isabelle McIntosh, the lady that placed the classified advertisement:
  • she was born in Scotland in 1887 (she was 53 at the time of the 1940 census); I think she was born in Kilmany, Fifeshire
  • her maiden name was Pearson
  • she is the sister of Agnes Goodall Pearson, the person she was looking for
  • the family was caucasian and Scottish
Ella Ogilvie, widowed, is a 30-year-old daughter with two children, children that might be alive at the time of writing. It would be interesting if one of them knew something about the details of Agnes Goodall Pearson. Did she reply to the advertisement? Did she come for Christmas one year? Or was Agnes' last known communication forever more the year documented in the classified ad (ie. in 1922). That would be expected if she was the Jane Doe in Saskatoon.

Agnes Goodall Pearson: Never Accounted For


I didn't find any other information on Agnes Goodall Pearson using online newspaper databases: the classified ad above is the only thing I note. Furthermore, a Google search (see below) for the quoted name contained no hits in written work on January 3rd, 2021. That search would cover forums and websites for missing people in addition to blogs and news websites. 


The only hit, before the publication of this blog post, that you are reading right now, was for Ancestry.com where I did find evidence of someone named Agnes Goodall Pearson. However, this was someone who died in Scotland in 1915. According to our classified ad, our Agnes Goodall Pearson was alive in 1922.

One way to rule out Agnes Goodall Pearson as the Lady in the Well is to find her, Agnes', grave. If you find a grave of Agnes Goodall Pearson (b. abt. 1870), then it rules her out as the Jane Doe in the well because the Jane Doe was in the well until 2006, not in a grave. I did not find a grave at FindAGrave.com for an Agnes Goodall Pearson, born in 1870, that matched. This is a exercise that could be revisited from time to time.

I did find a grave for an Agnes Pearson that died in 1937 (b. 1869). She was buried in Red Deer, Alberta and this is a small city on the Canadian prairies. I considered the possibility that this was Agnes Goodall Pearson but ruled this out. The Agnes Pearson that died in 1937 married into the name. Her husband, one Nels Pearson, is referenced in the grave marker. Agnes Goodall Pearson, by my research, didn't marry into the Pearson family name but rather she had it from birth through her father.

Regarding an Agnes Pearson that resided in Saskatoon, on that matter, I emailed Jeff O'Brien, Saskatoon archivist. He claimed to have evidence of an Agnes Pearson in and around Saskatoon in the 1910s and early 1920s. However, he could not find a grave for her in the Woodlawn Cemetery. O'Brien said that this was the place where people from Saskatoon were buried if they died before 1950.

Her address in Saskatoon may have been 279 3rd Avenue North according to Jeff O'Brien, Saskatoon Archivist. That address would be from the 1913 Henderson directory. Jeff O'Brien also said "Agnes Pearson is in the 1923 and 1924 Saskatoon Henderson directories living in rooms at the Colonial Apartments, a rooming house at 525 20th Street West." These could be different Agnes Pearsons than the one sought out in the classified advertisement or they could be the same.

I think the person, Agnes Goodall Pearson, that was the target of the classified advertisement was at this link at ancestry.com. She appeared in the 1901 Scotland Census. She has a death date that is unknown according to one profile


Her unknown death date is promising when it comes to corroborating her ID as the Jane Doe in the well. Someone who ended up down a well for decades as a victim of foul play would likely have a death date that's unknown to those who cared for her. In fact, none of the public family trees had her date of death as per the public ones at Ancestry.com. That's a bit of a clue too because it shows that no one has great information on when she died, which is what you'd expect for a missing person.

Right now, what I have on Agnes Goodall Pearson is this:
  • She was definitely born in or around 1870 in Forgan, Fife, Scotland
  • She definitely appeared in the 1901 Scottish Census
  • Her name definitely appears in a newspaper classified ad in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan on August 9th, 1938 with a reference to the year 1922 as her last-heard-from time
  • Possible connection: an Agnes Pearson appears in the Henderson (near Saskatoon) directory in 1913 (could be a different person)
  • Possible connection: an Agnes Pearson appears in the 1923/24 Saskatoon directories (could be a different person)
  • She then disappears from the records (challenge: prove this wrong)
  • She doesn't have a grave marker (challenge: prove me wrong, please)
  • She has no obituary in any newspaper (challenge: prove me wrong, please)
  • Whoever works on her family tree at Ancestry states that the circumstances surrounding her death are unknown -- which is a trademark of a missing person
  • Possible connection: maybe she ended up in the well with her last contact to her sister Isabelle coming in 1922; a lot seems to fit with the assumption and nothing to contradict and yet no smoking gun
Without a grave marker or a proven date of death that rules her out, this missing person remains a candidate as the Woman in the Well.

For further leads, use the name Agnes Goodall Pearson (born in or around 1870 as per her age of 52 in 1922). This woman is never married and was born in Scotland. When did she come to Canada? It seems sometime between 1901 and 1913. Her father is Alexander Pearson and her mother is an Isabella Pearson, an Isabella that's not to be confused with the classified ad poster of the same name. 

If you can, try and find a picture of Agnes Goodall Pearson so that it can then it could be compared, as food for thought, to the sketch of the Jane Doe. But we definitely want to try and rule Agnes out as the Jane Doe. If we can't do that then we can hold on to the opinion that she could be the Jane Doe. 

The main way to rule her out, I think, is to find her documented date of death (ie. an obituary) or gravemarker. With many angles to consider, you can see how there is a lot of work to be done in investigating this lead. Furthermore, I have leads on living relatives if DNA on the Jane Doe in the well is ever available. 


The Rahway Jane Doe from March 25, 1887 (New Jersey)

By: Shane Lambert
Original time of writing: February 6th, 2017
Updated: February 16th, 2021

The Rahway Jane Doe is an individual who was murdered in the town of Rahway, New Jersey, on March 25th, 1887. The mystery of the murder victim's identity stands out because, at the original time of writing back in 2017, it was the oldest unsolved mystery listed at DoeNetwork.org.

I researched this mystery using online newspaper databases for a good two hours on February 5th, 2017. At the time, I thought that there was very little chance of conclusively solving this mystery, even with modern technology that wasn't available in 1887 (online newspaper databases). The "clews" in this case (that's the 1887 spelling of "clues") are 99% red herrings if you ask me. Perhaps the best chance of identifying her is through DNA and the family-tree method.

Note: I think I generated a lead for investigation with a second look at this topic in 2021. Please visit my other article, suggesting that she might be a missing person named Annie Primroe, last seen in 1887.



Why Investigate the Rahway County Jane Doe Case?


If you are interested in this case, then it's not so much about justice or helping surviving relatives learn where a loved one went, is it? After all, the perpetrator can only be dead at this point and the same could be true of any kid sibling the victim may have had, right?

The matter is a curiosity for many and, for me, a matter of testing out online newspaper databases as a modern technology for finding "clews" in historical crimes. In this case, I wanted to see if anyone nationwide in the United States searched for a missing woman in the years that followed 1887 who was last known to be heading to New Jersey, something that might be revealed in archived newspapers, including in classified advertisements and/or in news pieces.

It may prove a viable way of looking into solving this murder or other murders, or at least generating a lead. In fact, I successfully used this method in the Saskatoon case of the Lady in the Well and managed to generate a tip for the police. But on the night that I devoted to the matter of the Rahway County Jane Doe, I certainly failed. Yet, that doesn't mean I didn't find out a lot of details involving this case.

Discovery by Four Brothers and a Dog’s Role


Four brothers named Frank, Irving, Thomas, and Alfred Worth found the mystery woman dead at 6:30am on Saturday, March 26th, 1887. She may have been a rail passenger the night before, as a woman like her got off the train at about 10pm on the 25th.

According to one J.H. Brunt, an individual who lived near where the deceased was found, his dog named Pete, was behaving strangely between 11pm and midnight on the 25th. Reportedly, his dog would bark to try and get the owner's attention and then run in the direction of where the body was eventually found the next morning. If we draw an inference from this behaviour, then the woman was murdered in the very late hours of the 25th, and perhaps the dog was aware of the commotion or heard her calls for help.



Incidentally, that description of how Pete acted reminded me of dog behavior associated with another unidentified person's case (NamUs UP 7582). I think dogs know when someone is in trouble, and they instinctively try to summon attention from nearby humanoids (see the relevant excerpt from the article immediately below).

Boston Daily GlobeThursday, March 31, 1887, Boston, Massachusetts

Loads of names are associated with this case, but whether they should be is a legitimate question. It stands to reason that only one of them could shed light on the woman's identity, unless she had some aliases.

The woman's throat was slashed, and she was probably robbed (one article I read said one of her pockets had been inspected by a bloody hand). She had no money when found, but the rings that were on her fingers weren't taken. That could be taken as evidence that robbery wasn't the motive. However, it could also be taken to mean it was just a bad and rushed plan.

Whoever killed her may have been a destitute opportunist who only happened upon her by chance. He may have made a haphazard decision to murder her and simply didn't do a complete robbery in panic. If Pete was barking in the distance, this could have scared the fellow into not doing a thorough job, especially if the woman was able to let out a scream.

But one "clew" in this case is that the woman's pocket was inspected with a bloody hand. Knife-wielding criminals often cut themselves when they stab or slash. That can be due to the momentum of the knife coming to a stop when it strikes someone, while the momentum of the hand that holds the knife continues to travel up the blade. Many knife-wielders have been identified or cast into suspicion because of wounds to their hands. The man who looked in the Jane Doe's pockets with bloody hands might have cut himself.

Handkerchief Clue in the Rahway Jane Doe Mystery


Blood was found smeared on a railing 600 yards from the victim after she was found. Near this point, a handkerchief was found with a name that resembled K.M. Noorz, writing that could not be made out clearly. A rubber stamp of some sort was also found with the name Timothy Byrne in the print.

Identifying blood, like the smear on the rail, in 1887 wasn't like it is in modern times. Something 600 yards away from ground zero (think 6 American football fields) cannot be tied to an event conclusively without a serologist. I found nothing on this matter that satisfactorily answered how the secondary scene could be tied to the first with certainty.

"Noorz," which was on the handkerchief, has been suggested to be a Danish name of "Noorse." Other victim names associated with this case are "Mary Cregan," "Mary Craney," "Mary Malthey" (or Maithey), "Kate Jennie Neary," "Mina Noorse," and "Kate M. Noony." None of the names were fruitful for me in terms of finding them in the newspaper databases I searched in hopes of finding missing people with those names. A 'eureka' moment would be if an article appeared anytime and anywhere in the world of newspapers after March 25th, 1887 about a mother, father, or brother looking for a "Kate M. Noony," for example, but no such moment happened in this case.

Did the Reward Lead to False Tips?


The authorities offered a $500 reward, part for finding the murderer and part for finding the woman's name, to anyone who provided a good lead. I actually wonder if the 'leads' and 'tips' in this case are run amok because of the reward. That is, were all the attempts to name her just attempts to make some money? That is a sad thought to think that people would falsely name a dead woman just to try to make money without due concern for justice and preventing the murderer from claiming more victims. However, that seemed to be the case based on how many people tried to name her.

For instance, one postal clerk claimed that he knew of a Timothy Byrne in the company of the so-called Kate M. Noony. The clerk claimed she received general delivery mail at the clerk's place of employment. Seems to me that would be a fantastic lead if true. Seems to me that her mail would keep coming from people far away that would not have known of her death. I wondered if the clerk just got the names from the newspapers, which covered this murder from coast to coast, and then just tried his luck at making a buck with his tip.

July 15th, 1887 - Lebanon Daily News (click to make bigger)

Rahway Jane Doe: Not a Prostitute


Something to note is that in my research I found a report that claimed that the Mayor of Rahway, one Mayor Daly, claimed that the "medical examination" of this Jane Doe "proved beyond all doubt" that she had "never been married." I'm taking that to mean that they inspected her vagina and figured she was a virgin.

The deceased was buried in a grave that called her "An Unknown Woman" according to the picture at DoeNetwork. I read one article that grotesquely misquoted what was actually written on her grave. Furthermore, her grave is actually wrong in reporting that she was found dead on March 25th, which was the day she was murdered according to Pete the dog (she was found the next day).

Apparently, she was buried far away from the deceased snooties of 1887 Rahway out of fear that she wasn't a decent enough woman to merit burial near them. As a late-night murder victim, she was believed to be a possible prostitute. Her virginity, however, attests to the fact that she wasn't one.


Lastly, I found an interesting article somewhere that said there was a picture of her post-mortem in the March 30th, 1887 edition of "New York World." If anyone has access to that I would be interested in the picture. Lastly, please make one comment just so I know someone is out there that also bothers with 130-year-old Jane-Doe mysteries.

Down and Out in the Canadian Rockies

A BLEAK GLIMPSE INTO RESORT TOWN LIFE FROM A WORKER'S PERSPECTIVE

Get your copy of this engaging ebook now

Available on Amazon for Kindle or as a physical copy

Featured Post

Carbon Jane Doe - Funeral Home Theory

Author : Shane Lambert Original Time of Writing : August 23, 2025 All articles are subject to editing after the original posting. Could F...

Best of MPC (as selected by the site's author)