Unknown man dubbed "Jack the Tripper" assaulted women in 1893 Indiana

By: Shane Lambert

You've all heard of Jack the Ripper, the serial killer who terrorized the Whitechapel area of London in the late 1800s. However, I doubt many of you have heard of "Jack the Tripper."

No doubt his name is derived from the serial killer's. He was an unnamed criminal who attacked women in Indianapolis in 1893.

His modus operandi? He would grab women by the ankles, lift them, and then make off like a coward as they lay maimed.

May 3rd, 1893 Indianapolis Sun

Another, and far more villainous, man to take a moniker from the serial killer is Jack the Stripper, a serial killer who operated in Hammersmith in the mid-1960s.

Denise Kathleen Anderson's Disappearance -- Newspaper Clippings

Author: Shane Lambert
Original time of writing: February 2017
Updated and revised: February 17, 2026
All articles are subject to editing after original posting.

Missing Person: Denise Kathleen Anderson
NamUs Case: MP27540 (Active as of 2026)

Date of Last Contact: April 13, 1971 (approximately 5:30 a.m.)
Last Known Location: Apartment at 925 16th Street, Sacramento, California (about 38.57881034100586, -121.48476808126783 on Google Maps but the app only goes back to 2007)

Age at Disappearance: 22 (DOB is probably July 13th, 1948)
Sex: Female
Race/Ethnicity: White / Caucasian
Height: 5'2" – 5'4"
Weight: 120 – 125 lbs
Hair: Brown, straight, longer than shoulder length
Eyes: Brown


Attempts to Identify Denise Kathleen Anderson's Parents


Denise Kathleen Anderson's Family 

When it comes to identifying someone in the documentary record, the danger of a same-name match is ever present. They are common, even with regard to middle names. Matters get far less common when you start working with birthdates. The chances of mistaken identity get extremely remote when working with relatives. Here's a look at who I think Denise Kathleen Anderson's parents were.

Denise's Mother: Helen Vassilopoulos


I am extremely confident that her mother was Helen Vassilopoulos (14 December, 1924 to 17 November, 2016). This is supported at Websleuths, a website that has some serious web researchers, and by the obituary of Helen Vassilopoulos as well. Her obituary from 2016 mentions that she, Helen, had a daughter named Denise Anderson and I don't think it's just a same-name match. The obituary is below and should be read.

Denise Kathleen Anderson's mother's obituary.


The obituary's language is interesting in regard to Denise Anderson. It does not use typical obituary language in describing a daughter of the deceased. In fact, the language used does hint at the Denise that is mention being a missing person, thus matching Denise Kathleen Anderson.

Typically, the language in an obituary would be "She was predeceased by her daughter, Denise Anderson" or "She was survived by her daughter, Denise Anderson." These kinds of statements in obituaries are not uncommon at all but incredibly common when describing the child or children in an obituary of a deceased. This, I'm sure, will jive with the common knowledge of most adults.

But when a missing person is described in an obituary, the language changes because the fate of the missing person is not known. I don't expect this detail regarding obituaries to be common knowledge but I've researched hundreds, if not small thousands, or missing persons cases and read numerous obituaries where a missing person is described in relationship to their deceased relative.

"Presumed deceased" is one phrase that is used but "Helen had a daughter, Denise Anderson" works as well. It is one way to describe Helen's daughter without committing to Denise being alive or dead. Since no one knows, with full certainty, whether Denise is alive or dead, then the statement is appropriate. 

Denise's age in 1971, when she disappeared, is known. She was 22 years old according to her NamUs profile. That matches an Ancestry record for a Denise Kathleen Anderson. That same record states that her mother's maiden name was Vassilopoulos.

Probably the same Denise Kathleen Anderson.



Who Was Denise's Father?


Finding her father was complicated. As of February 19th, 2026, I would state with some confidence that it was a man named Frederick Edward Anderson. He died June 30th, 1969 at the age of 77 years, meaning he would have been born between July 1, 1891 – June 30, 1892. The obituary for this individual listed two children and contains a nagging missing detail. Look at the obituary below: a surviving child, as of Frederick's death, is described as Denise K. Anderson. 

Whether that "K" stands for Kathleen is one matter. Another matter is whether it would actually be the same Denise Kathleen Anderson (because I did find a second one in California).



Here is where things start to get a little bit tricky. As you can see, the deceased Frederick Edward Anderson had a son with a pretty similar name "Fred E. Anderson Jr." So in addition to verifying if the Denise K. Anderson described in the obit is the same one we're dealing with in this article, my searches were compounded by a father-son exact name match (they ended up both being named Frederick Edward Anderson, with younger adding Jr.).

But I found a census from 1950 that was a good piece of evidence. The following census shows a 1-year old in 1950 named Denise K. Anderson and that matches our Denise Kathleen Anderson, because she was born in July 1948 and would be 1 years old for about the first half of 1950. Furthermore, according to the census below, Denise (described as "daughter") is living with Helen Anderson, which would be the married named of Helen Vassilopoulos (Denise's mother), who is described as Helen Vassilopoulos Anderson in her obituary.

The census below also shows the head of the household as Frederick E. Anderson, which is very convincing proof that this man was her father. The problem is the age does not match. It lists him with an age of 36 years old, whereas the obituary above would mean that Frederick Edward Anderson should be in his 50's as of 1950. This detail was a major source of confusion in my research and suggested that the two pieces of evidence pertained to different people.

1950 Census

The obituary says this: 
  • Denise Kathleen Anderson, daughter of Frederick Edward Anderson (who would be b. 1891 or 1892 by his age and death date)
The 1950 census says this:
  • Denise K. Anderson, daughter of Frederick E. Anderson (b. about 1914 by an age of 36 in 1950)
Are we looking at two different families? A different birthdate does mean a different person. But one thing caught my eye: the number "36" for his age appears to have been written over something. The following is a close-up of the age for Frederick Edward Anderson as represented in the 1950 Census.



That is one messy 3 in 36. I could make it out to be a 2 using the bottom or a sloppy 5 without much of a spine in the 5. But all I think that can responsibly be said is that the number that was written could be disputed.

So what do we have?
  • There's a Frederick Edward Anderson who was born about 1892;
  • There's a Frederick Edward Anderson Jr. born about 1924;
  • If that's a 36 in the 1950 census, there is a Frederick Edward Anderson born about 1916.

This latter Frederick Edward Anderson is not one that could verify in any other document. When it comes to document verifications, you are never done looking but finding this person, a Frederick Edward Anderson who was born in 1916, separate of the 1950 Census used above is one task at hand that is on-going.

Frederick Edward Anderson, the one in the obituary at the start of this section (~1892 to 1969) appears in the 1940 Census as well. It shows a man named Frederick E. Anderson as the head of a household with his wife Ruth L. Anderson and son Fred E. Anderson.


Taken from the 1940 census.

The census snipped immediately above has a nagging detail. Frederick E. Anderson is listed at age 45, meaning he would be born around 1895. The obituary had an age of 77 in 1969 for the Frederick E. Anderson there. A birthdate of 1891 or 1892 would make for a different person, regardless of a same-name match, than for a person with a birthdate of 1895. The matter cannot simply be overlooked without risking the conflating of different identities.

But I still think the Frederick E. Anderson in the 1940 census is the same Frederick E. Anderson living with Denise and her mother Helen in the 1950 census. I make an inferential leap on this matter but ground some confidence in more than just a same-name match. Both the 1950 census and the 1940 census show Frederick E. Anderson as originally hailing from Illinois, employed as an engineer, and employed with the US government in that capacity. 

Frederick E. Anderson's employment information in the 1940 census.

Frederick E. Anderson's employment information in the 1950 census.

Despite inconsistences in years of birth, both the Frederick E. Anderson in the 1940 census and the Frederick E. Anderson in the 1950 census were employed as engineers for the US Army or US War Department. This suggests that they were the same person, despite the mismatched ages. A same-name match with first, middle, and last name, a same-state of birth, the same profession (ie. engineering), and same employer is a lot to overlook simply because of an age discrepancy when the writing is sloppy.

Furthermore, looking back at the 1930 census shows a Frederick E. Anderson living with a woman named Ruth and a son named Fred who was an engineer as well but with the state of California as an employer. That document is not as well preserved but the word "Engineer" or "Engineering" seems to appear in the first box, perhaps after the word hydraulic.

Frederick E. Anderson's employment information in the 1930 census.

The 1930 and 1940 census link the Andersons by house number 861 as well. Importantly, the 1940 census states that Frederick E. Anderson is 45 whereas the 1930 census states he is 38. This proves that the census did not accurately depict ages by year of publication. The expectation is 10 years of aging for a ten-year gap between censuses. Perhaps 9 or 11 could be expected, depending on time of year when the work is completed. However, seven years of aging for a ten-year gap between censuses is hard to accept. It's fair to say that ages in the censuses from this time frame need to be taken lightly.

My conclusion on this section is a fairly confident "yes" that the Denise K. Anderson mentioned in the obituary for Frederick E. Anderson is the same person as the missing person, Denise Kathleen Anderson. It's not just a same-name match: there's evidence to show that Denise Kathleen Anderson lived with a man of that name when she was very young along with her mother. The evidence also shows this man's age was inconsistently reported and without perfectly clear writing. The matter can be looked at from other angles, but it seems her father was Frederick Edward Anderson (b. in the 1890's and died in 1969). In this case, the newspaper obituary seems to be a stronger piece of evidence than the census.


Other family


If I have her parents correct, her half-brother would be Frederick Edward Anderson Jr., who was five years old with the 1930 census and 15 years old with the 1940 census. I think he might be the same person who owned or part-owned several sports franchises.

A snippet from Ancestry

Snipped from Newspapers.com. His death on Monday, reported on Wednesday, March 26th, would match the death date above in the Ancestry Snippet.


His draft card. His mother name used the father's name (ie. Mrs. F.E. Anderson).



Circumstances of Denise's Disappearance:
  • Last seen (or heard?) asleep in her apartment at approximately 5:30 a.m. on April 13, 1971, by one of her two female roommates.
  • A roommate borrowed Denise’s car that morning and returned it around 2:30 p.m.; Denise was gone at that time.
  • Her vehicle remained at the residence after that day.
  • Her personal belongings were reportedly left behind.
  • No known financial activity occurred after her disappearance.
  • She did not report to her job at a Wells Fargo branch and did not attend subsequent theatre rehearsals.
Denise's case is one of the true vanishings in North American history. Based on what's available and published about her, there are no clues as to her fate after she was last seen. Everything is pure conjecture, running through common missing person's scenarios. Those would include leaving her apartment willingly with someone she trusted or abducted.

The label "true vanishing" attached to this blog post will link you to some other cases that basically have no significant lead. That's different from cases where a person of interest, a suspect, charges, a physical clue, clandestine connections, or a witness clue provides some insight. Denise is an "into thin air" kind of missing person.


1965 Sacramento High School Yearbook

Employment and Activities:
  • She went to Sacramento High School. Her name and possibly her picture appears on Page 160 of the 1965 yearbook on Ancestry.
  • She was employed at a Wells Fargo bank branch in Sacramento. I found one that was located at 555 Capitol Mall in 1971, which would have been a 20-minute walk. However, if this was her branch or not is not know.
  • She had been very active in the stage-acting scene for four years by the time of her disappearance (not including high school plays).
  • From age 18 through age 22, Denise Anderson was:
    • Consistently active in theatre for at least four consecutive years
    • Involved in productions at:
      • Harlequin Stage (community theatre)
      • Sacramento State College
      • Sacramento City College
      • American River College (collaborative production)
  • She was frequently named in cast lists and pictured in multiple productions
  • She was firmly embedded in Sacramento’s collegiate arts community
  • Months before her disappearance time, she was active in local theatre; listed as a cast member in a January 3, 1971 Sacramento Bee production notice for the play “Liliom” at the Eaglet Theater. She also had a supporting role in a play that was about to debut in two days at the time of her April 13th, 1971 disappearance.
Jan 3, 1971. The Sacramento Bee.


Clothing/Accessories Note:
  • According to reporting and NamUs, Denise was known to wear a black short-hair wig; this item was reportedly missing from the apartment.


Denise Kathleen Anderson was 22 years old when she disappeared from Sacramento, California in April 1971. Accounts indicate she was last seen at her apartment very early that morning, and she did not report to work or to theatre commitments afterward.

I first wrote about this case in 2017, when I was fairly new to missing person blogging. I decided, with the experience I've gained over the years, that I would take a fresh look at this case. Let's start with some of the original journalism but note that nothing contemporaneous to her disappearance was available.


Sep 6, 1973. The Sacramento Bee.

Denise Was In a Play at the Time of Her Disappearance

Denise was in a play known as "Marat/Sade" at the time of her disappearance. The long name was “The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade" by Peter Weiss.

The opening night for the play was April 15th, 1971, meaning Denise disappeared two days before the opening of the play. She was cast as Simone Evrard (mispelled as Simone Everad).

I did not find Denise among listed cast members, however, her name appeared in a caption underneath a photo on April 18th, 1971. This photo was published five days after she was last seen, meaning that it must have been taken before her disappearance and during rehearsals.

Denise appears to be the women standing awkwardly and barefoot.

I made an effort to find out who replaced Denise, because the show did go on despite her disappearance two days before it debuted. The play received good reviews and ran into May, as planned. Her character was not a plot-driving one.

I did wonder if the wig that missing from her apartment was depicted in the picture above, but could not authenticate this. Also, I found no reference to her disappearance at all in the numerous articles or advertisements I read regarding this play. It struck me that her disappearance was not considered too serious at the time or not considered clandestine at the time. But the photo above would be one of her last in a likelihood.

Centerplayers Production — The Persecution and Assassination of Jean-Paul Marat as Performed by the Inmates of the Asylum of Charenton under the Direction of the Marquis de Sade (April 15th, 1971–May 1971)

Bob Brock — Jean-Paul Marat
Haze Bergeron — Marquis de Sade
Tom McGraw — Duperret
Michael Hefner — Jacques Roux
James L. (Jim) Foster — Institution Director (Coulmier)
Pat Dunnigan Shread — Herald
Zoe Riddle — Charlotte Corday
Victoria (Tori) Samuels — Marat’s nurse
Cheryl Watson — Singer
Tom Ribordy — Singer
John Karr — Singer
Nancy Vay David — Singer
*Denise Anderson — Simonne Evrard (spelled Simone Everad)

Director: John Gunn

*disappeared two days before opening night for the play/replacement not known


Known Serial Killers in the Area at the Time (Sacramento 1971)

I did not find a lot of information on active serial killers in Sacramento in 1971. 

As of April 1971, Northern California would soon become associated with several notorious serial offenders, but none of the known active killers at the time clearly matched the circumstances regarding Denise Anderson’s disappearance.

The Zodiac Killer’s confirmed attacks occurred between 1968 and 1969 and involved public shootings and stabbings of couples and a taxi driver, not quiet residential disappearances. He did send a letter in March 1971, so he was alive at about the time of Anderson's disappearance but nothing linking him to Sacramento.

Juan Corona was arrested in May 1971 for murdering male agricultural workers in rural Yuba City, but that is a very different victim profile. 

Herbert Mullin’s killings occurred in 1972–1973 in the Santa Cruz area, after Denise vanished. It is possible that earlier crimes went undetected but nothing is known to link him to Denise's disappearance.

Joseph James DeAngelo’s (ie. The Original Night Stalker) confirmed crime series in California began years later, with the Visalia Ransacker burglaries starting in 1973 and the East Area Rapist attacks beginning in 1976.

According to an LATimes piece on the DeAngelo, he was in Sacramento at about the correct time: "In the spring of 1971, when (Joseph James DeAngelo and Bonnie Colwell) were juniors at Cal State Sacramento" (Paige St. John, Man in the Window). This does mean that there was an eventual serial killer in Sacramento at about the time when Anderson disappeared, in fact, DeAngelo is one of the worst serial killers in American history. If he disappeared Anderson, then that would extend his known active years.

But Denise's case, to my knowledge, is without a serious clue. 

Further reading: this blog post looked to be a serious effort on the topic of Denise Kathleen Anderson. It contains address information and perhaps even a bit of a challenge to what her address was at the time of her disappearance.

The Rahway Jane Doe from March 25, 1887 (New Jersey)

By: Shane Lambert
Original time of writing: February 6th, 2017
Updated: February 16th, 2021

The Rahway Jane Doe is an individual who was murdered in the town of Rahway, New Jersey, on March 25th, 1887. The mystery of the murder victim's identity stands out because, at the original time of writing back in 2017, it was the oldest unsolved mystery listed at DoeNetwork.org.

I researched this mystery using online newspaper databases for a good two hours on February 5th, 2017. At the time, I thought that there was very little chance of conclusively solving this mystery, even with modern technology that wasn't available in 1887 (online newspaper databases). The "clews" in this case (that's the 1887 spelling of "clues") are 99% red herrings if you ask me. Perhaps the best chance of identifying her is through DNA and the family-tree method.

Note: I think I generated a lead for investigation with a second look at this topic in 2021. Please visit my other article, suggesting that she might be a missing person named Annie Primroe, last seen in 1887.



Why Investigate the Rahway County Jane Doe Case?


If you are interested in this case, then it's not so much about justice or helping surviving relatives learn where a loved one went, is it? After all, the perpetrator can only be dead at this point and the same could be true of any kid sibling the victim may have had, right?

The matter is a curiosity for many and, for me, a matter of testing out online newspaper databases as a modern technology for finding "clews" in historical crimes. In this case, I wanted to see if anyone nationwide in the United States searched for a missing woman in the years that followed 1887 who was last known to be heading to New Jersey, something that might be revealed in archived newspapers, including in classified advertisements and/or in news pieces.

It may prove a viable way of looking into solving this murder or other murders, or at least generating a lead. In fact, I successfully used this method in the Saskatoon case of the Lady in the Well and managed to generate a tip for the police. But on the night that I devoted to the matter of the Rahway County Jane Doe, I certainly failed. Yet, that doesn't mean I didn't find out a lot of details involving this case.

Discovery by Four Brothers and a Dog’s Role


Four brothers named Frank, Irving, Thomas, and Alfred Worth found the mystery woman dead at 6:30am on Saturday, March 26th, 1887. She may have been a rail passenger the night before, as a woman like her got off the train at about 10pm on the 25th.

According to one J.H. Brunt, an individual who lived near where the deceased was found, his dog named Pete, was behaving strangely between 11pm and midnight on the 25th. Reportedly, his dog would bark to try and get the owner's attention and then run in the direction of where the body was eventually found the next morning. If we draw an inference from this behaviour, then the woman was murdered in the very late hours of the 25th, and perhaps the dog was aware of the commotion or heard her calls for help.



Incidentally, that description of how Pete acted reminded me of dog behavior associated with another unidentified person's case (NamUs UP 7582). I think dogs know when someone is in trouble, and they instinctively try to summon attention from nearby humanoids (see the relevant excerpt from the article immediately below).

Boston Daily GlobeThursday, March 31, 1887, Boston, Massachusetts

Loads of names are associated with this case, but whether they should be is a legitimate question. It stands to reason that only one of them could shed light on the woman's identity, unless she had some aliases.

The woman's throat was slashed, and she was probably robbed (one article I read said one of her pockets had been inspected by a bloody hand). She had no money when found, but the rings that were on her fingers weren't taken. That could be taken as evidence that robbery wasn't the motive. However, it could also be taken to mean it was just a bad and rushed plan.

Whoever killed her may have been a destitute opportunist who only happened upon her by chance. He may have made a haphazard decision to murder her and simply didn't do a complete robbery in panic. If Pete was barking in the distance, this could have scared the fellow into not doing a thorough job, especially if the woman was able to let out a scream.

But one "clew" in this case is that the woman's pocket was inspected with a bloody hand. Knife-wielding criminals often cut themselves when they stab or slash. That can be due to the momentum of the knife coming to a stop when it strikes someone, while the momentum of the hand that holds the knife continues to travel up the blade. Many knife-wielders have been identified or cast into suspicion because of wounds to their hands. The man who looked in the Jane Doe's pockets with bloody hands might have cut himself.

Handkerchief Clue in the Rahway Jane Doe Mystery


Blood was found smeared on a railing 600 yards from the victim after she was found. Near this point, a handkerchief was found with a name that resembled K.M. Noorz, writing that could not be made out clearly. A rubber stamp of some sort was also found with the name Timothy Byrne in the print.

Identifying blood, like the smear on the rail, in 1887 wasn't like it is in modern times. Something 600 yards away from ground zero (think 6 American football fields) cannot be tied to an event conclusively without a serologist. I found nothing on this matter that satisfactorily answered how the secondary scene could be tied to the first with certainty.

"Noorz," which was on the handkerchief, has been suggested to be a Danish name of "Noorse." Other victim names associated with this case are "Mary Cregan," "Mary Craney," "Mary Malthey" (or Maithey), "Kate Jennie Neary," "Mina Noorse," and "Kate M. Noony." None of the names were fruitful for me in terms of finding them in the newspaper databases I searched in hopes of finding missing people with those names. A 'eureka' moment would be if an article appeared anytime and anywhere in the world of newspapers after March 25th, 1887 about a mother, father, or brother looking for a "Kate M. Noony," for example, but no such moment happened in this case.

Did the Reward Lead to False Tips?


The authorities offered a $500 reward, part for finding the murderer and part for finding the woman's name, to anyone who provided a good lead. I actually wonder if the 'leads' and 'tips' in this case are run amok because of the reward. That is, were all the attempts to name her just attempts to make some money? That is a sad thought to think that people would falsely name a dead woman just to try to make money without due concern for justice and preventing the murderer from claiming more victims. However, that seemed to be the case based on how many people tried to name her.

For instance, one postal clerk claimed that he knew of a Timothy Byrne in the company of the so-called Kate M. Noony. The clerk claimed she received general delivery mail at the clerk's place of employment. Seems to me that would be a fantastic lead if true. Seems to me that her mail would keep coming from people far away that would not have known of her death. I wondered if the clerk just got the names from the newspapers, which covered this murder from coast to coast, and then just tried his luck at making a buck with his tip.

July 15th, 1887 - Lebanon Daily News (click to make bigger)

Rahway Jane Doe: Not a Prostitute


Something to note is that in my research I found a report that claimed that the Mayor of Rahway, one Mayor Daly, claimed that the "medical examination" of this Jane Doe "proved beyond all doubt" that she had "never been married." I'm taking that to mean that they inspected her vagina and figured she was a virgin.

The deceased was buried in a grave that called her "An Unknown Woman" according to the picture at DoeNetwork. I read one article that grotesquely misquoted what was actually written on her grave. Furthermore, her grave is actually wrong in reporting that she was found dead on March 25th, which was the day she was murdered according to Pete the dog (she was found the next day).

Apparently, she was buried far away from the deceased snooties of 1887 Rahway out of fear that she wasn't a decent enough woman to merit burial near them. As a late-night murder victim, she was believed to be a possible prostitute. Her virginity, however, attests to the fact that she wasn't one.


Lastly, I found an interesting article somewhere that said there was a picture of her post-mortem in the March 30th, 1887 edition of "New York World." If anyone has access to that I would be interested in the picture. Lastly, please make one comment just so I know someone is out there that also bothers with 130-year-old Jane-Doe mysteries.

Down and Out in the Canadian Rockies

A BLEAK GLIMPSE INTO RESORT TOWN LIFE FROM A WORKER'S PERSPECTIVE

Get your copy of this engaging ebook now

Available on Amazon for Kindle or as a physical copy

Namus UP#4757 vs. Namus MP#3229 (Scott William Crain) - I tried, I failed, and it's not totally my fault

By: Shane Lambert

I spent a couple hours today looking at a John 'Clinton' Doe case, an individual in his teens or early 20s, that was found by hunters in southern Wisconsin. I started as I often do, by simply cross referencing the John Doe's time of death (in this case estimated) with missing-people reports. I found a photo of a missing person whose age was a couple years out of range, but one who I felt resembled the decedent.

At the end of everything, the conclusion is that Namus Missing Person #3229, Scott William Crain, is not Namus Unidentified Person #4757.

However, getting to that conclusion was a little harder than it had to be I think. The first thing I do when I subjectively associate a Missing Person with an Unidentified Decedent is what I think everyone should do: look at the ruled-out individuals listed on the opening page of the Unidentified Decedent at Namus. I did that and I didn't see Scott William Crain's name as per the chart below.

If you are working on this Doe, here's the ruled-out chart to use: link.

I figured, quite fallaciously, that since Scott William Crain wasn't on the John Doe's list of rule outs that he was worth pursuing. I did the online research and came to the opinion that the two were probably not one in the same person. However, when the timing allows it and when a sketch of a Doe resembles an MP (missing person) I just can't let it go without trying my hardest. 

In this case, I decided to contact Melinda Whitehead (formerly Spillman), someone who I learned knew the MP in this case. I messaged her on Facebook, introduced myself, revealed my hobby, and asked for a few minutes of her time and she obliged.

She too saw the resemblance, however she reviewed her previous messages on the case with other individuals and informed me that Scott William Crain was in fact a rule out for the John Doe found in Clinton, Wisconsin. She was kind enough to send me an email that she received on the matter from a task-force member who has worked to identify the decedent (email is from Jack Friess with Melinda Spillman as a recipient, dated October 12th, 2015):

"Re:  William Scott Crain: NamUs MP # 3229
         John Clinton Doe: NamUs UP # 4757....

William Scot Crain is eliminated as being John "Clinton" Doe based on the following inconsistencies between these two individuals:

      1. Both Crain's and JCD's DNA profiles are resident and searching in the same computer databank without an association as reported today by A. Dobbs, NamUs RSA.
      2. Crain's age in 1994 was 22, and JCD's is estimated to be 17-20.
      3. Crain lived in Kentucky, an area outside JCD's Iso-area of Wisconsin, Minnesota, or Michigan.
      4. Crain is 72" to 74" tall, quite a bit taller than JCD's estimated height of 65" to 67".
      5. From Crain's NamUs photo, it appears he has a significant over-bite on his front teeth, confirmed by NOK.   JCD had no such over-bite.
      6. Crain's favorite music group was Guns and Roses and Metallica (on shirt in his NamUs photo).  While certainly heavy metal, his favorite group was not Venom."

Point 2 and point 6 are total fluff in my opinion. In regard to Point 2, there's not much to being a couple years outside of a small age range. In regard to Point 6, as I write I'm wearing a Los Angeles Dodgers hat. It doesn't mean they are my favorite team, it just means I think blue and white are my colors. Wearing clothing only counts as endorsement for contracted professional athletes. However, DNA counts for a ton and, if Iso-area is what I think it means, it counts for far less but is still insightful (ie. I think it has to do with eating habits and teeth). 

What also counts for something is just listing a ruled-out individual among the rule outs at Namus. On that matter, Melinda stated she would follow up on why William Scott Crain's name was not there, so hopefully, if nothing else, that happens.

Either way, it's back to the drawing board for this case and for my efforts to try and provide a fruitful lead to law enforcement, coroners, or loved ones when it comes to finding a missing person.

Conclusion: unless DNA databases are flawed, the composite sketch below is not of the missing person in the photograph below.

John Clinton Doe
William Scott Crain.





Further reading: http://findjcd.org/.

My Hunch on Sand Canyon Road John Doe - Namus UP#7582 Might Be MP#29973 (Updated - no match)

By: Shane Lambert

July 12th, 2016 Update: 

"Shane

….quick review of dentals proves it isn’t our guy.  Our UP has tooth 32, this MP does not.
Thanks for being so interested in the case, though.  We do appreciate it. 

Marika

Marika A Morris, D-ABMDI
Medicolegal Death Investigator/Technician
Washoe County Medical Examiner/Coroner's Office"


At least I got him added as a rule out.


Original article:

I was working a few nights ago on Namus unidentified person #7582. He is an unknown individual whose remains were found in 1992 in Nevada with the following physical description with DoeNetwork.com:

"Estimated Age: 35-50 years old
Race: White, of European descent
Gender: Male
Height: 6'0" to 6'2"
Weight: Unknown
Hair Color: Reddish brown
Eye Color: Unknown
Distinguishing Marks/Features: Unknown."

There are a lot of clues as to who he is but, as of July 10th, 2016, he has not been identified. However, after working on his case for a few hours I believe that I have found an individual who is a candidate for examination as a potential match - one that is not listed as already ruled out with this John Doe's Namus profile.

Believed to be a likeness of the individual.
Due to the fact that the Doe has not been identified in about 25 years I decided to focus on the whole United States when looking for a missing person that could be the John Doe. My reasoning is that someone who does not get identified for such a lengthy period of time is someone who clearly has no obvious match. If the decedent lived within a few miles of the location that he was found in, chances are he would already have been identified.

Furthermore, that he was found in a rural location near a highway suggests that he was a traveler in my opinion. Accordingly, looking outside of the area where he was found seemed like a reasonable thing to do. Since the greater Los Angeles area is one of the more populated regions in the relevant sector of the USA, that's where I focused my efforts.

The John Doe was not found near Los Angeles but rather "off of Sand Canyon Road, approximately a mile east of Highway 338, near Wellington, in Lyon County, Nevada." The date that he was first discovered is March 12th, 1992, at that time by an unknown caller. Law enforcement, after responding to the call, found him the next day on March 13th, 1992. His estimated date of death is unknown, however his remains were only skeletal suggesting that some time had passed since his death.

There are some possible leads/clues or possible red herrings involved with this John Doe. Specifically a car was reported to have been abandoned in the area in October of 1991. Also there is a dog that a local resident claimed used to come around her place at about that time and leave in the direction of where the remains were eventually found. Importantly, the John Doe was found to be near a broken dog collar so perhaps the deceased owned one.

To get to the heart of the matter, the individual that I think should be looked at is named Joseph Anthony Stuart. He is a missing person (Namus #29973) as of September 6th, 1991, about six months ahead of the discovery of the John Doe. His sparse Namus file does not mention a dog, it does not have a photo, the relative heights are not a perfect match, and Namus MP does not mention that he was a vehicle owner. For skeptics, those are valid points that suggest that Mr. Stuart and the decedent may not be one in the same person.

However, Stuart was a 35-year old white male with brown hair. Those features match the features of the decedent who was 35-50 with reddish-brown hair. The height of the decedent relative to the John Doe is a little off in this case, by about four inches. I feel that that's the strongest rule-out based on the information available at Namus.

Maybe the timing is a little off, however it cannot rule out Mr. Stuart as a possible match to the John Doe in my view. Mr. Stuart was last seen in early September 1991, he was reported missing on September 26th of that year, and the decedent was found in March 1992. Since the remains were skeletal perhaps Mr. Stuart died from causes unknown at this location in September/October of 1991 and his remains decomposed until he was found in his skeletal state.

Geographically the decedent and Mr. Stuart are not a dead-on hit. Mr. Stuart was last seen in Fullerton, California while the deceased was found in Nevada, near Wellington and just off of Highway 338.

However, what cannot be overlooked with Mr. Stuart is a comment that he made to a friend before disappearing. According to his Namus profile "Stuart had mentioned to his friend that he was heading up to Reno, Nevada to look into a possible job." 

One route from Fullerton to Reno would take you to within a reasonable proximity of where the decedent was found. Thus, the clues in each case, that of Stuart's and that of the John Doe's do align in a way that I think a reasonable person will find intriguing. The physical description matches to a large extent, the timing matches, and when the comment about going to Reno is factored in the geography in fact matches as well.

Did Stuart have a car? Did he have a dog? Did he hitchhike? Did he head to the area that the decedent was found in?

Those are very good questions that I pose to anyone that is in a position to investigate further. Perhaps a much simpler question, one that those who knew him may be able to speak to, is simply if John Anthony Stuart looks like the decedent and if the found clothes match as well.





Snohomish County Doe Soon To Be Identified or Another Dead End?

Update: This one was solved in the summer of 2020. Her name was Elizabeth Roberts.

Link good as of October 2020: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8463099/Girl-murdered-Washington-identified-43-years-later-DNA-taken-hair.html

The rule-out candidate that I submitted was ruled out.

Update from Coroner's office on March 9th, 2017: 

"Hi Shane,

New South Wales PD’s forensic odontologist performed a dental comparison between our Jane Doe and Narelle Cox and ruled out a match based on dental records.

I hope you find your Narelle and we figure out who our Jane is!  Thank you again,

Jane"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By: Shane Lambert (UncoolNegated on WebSleuths)

She was found dead on August 14th, 1977 - a couple of days before Elvis died - in Snohomish County, Washington. Her murderer was subsequently convicted, but he could not identify her. Her name has remained a mystery for what is almost forty years now.

However, a June 23rd, 2016 article from Komonews.com at least offers a little bit of hope that the Snohomish County Jane Doe, whose composite sketch appears below, might be named soon.

According to the article, which can be read here, an Australian phoned Washington state to offer a potential lead on who the Jane Doe sketched on the left might be. As of July 9th, those that follow missing persons cases are still in the dark.

However, the Australian identity of the caller got me working. In looking over the missing persons at an Australian website, my guess would be that the decedent is Narelle Mary Cox, pictured to the right.
The details surrounding Cox's disappearance corroborate to a large extent with the Jane Doe. Firstly, Cox was 21 when she disappeared and that is within the hypothesized age range of the Jane Doe above. 

Secondly, Cox was last seen in the months prior to the discovery of the decedent. One source, DoeNetwork.com, says that Cox has been "Missing since July 20, 1977" (my bolding/underlining). Another source, a news article from 2006 by Julia Iles, claims "whatever dreams Narelle Mary Cox had as she hitch-hiked from Grafton...were never realised. She has been missing ever since" (bolding/underlining added).

Her travel plans were ambiguous but maybe those "dreams" were to travel to America. It's the distance between Cox's last known location and the Jane Doe's location that will certainly cause many to dismiss a connection between the two.

On other matters, whether the face matches the composite sketch is a matter of opinion but certainly all will agree that there are some similarities. The parted hair matches, the skin color matches, and the shortness of the hair in the forehead area matches too. Those that attempt to match composite sketches to photos of unknown people will tell you that anything in the ballpark is worth looking at. 

Another match is that the decedent was a hitch-hiker and, as per the quote above, so was Cox. Circumstantial? For sure. Axiomatic proof? Hardly.

It's important to stress that I'm not claiming that the composite sketch and Narelle Mary Cox are of one and the same person. That's an announcement that comes with stronger evidence that only law enforcement and coroner's can provide. 

However, when I read that someone from Australia had called the USA regarding the Snohomish County Jane Doe, I scoured through hours of Australian databases and news sources. Narelle Mary Cox is my guess based on her matching age, her matching look, her matching hitch-hiking tendencies, and the corroborating dates. Even if she isn't the one being looked at based on the Australian-caller lead, she's a candidate for a ruling out in my view.

That most that object will do so on grounds of how far apart Cox was, when last seen, from the resting place of the decedent is not something that bothers me at all. The amount of time that it has taken to identify the Jane Doe is actually a clue.

If the decedent was an American in life then she probably would have been matched to the Jane Doe already for cultural reasons. When a pretty, caucasian, and young 21 year old is killed in her home country, she so often gets identified because of the abundance of affiliated news coverage. Could be that trans-national travel is what has been the hold up in this case all along.
-----------------------------
September 2017: Additional photos of Narelle Mary Cox







Featured Post

Netanyahu Dead Rumors 2026: AI Deepfakes or Proof He's Alive? Societal and Legal Issues for Missing People

By: Shane Lambert Rumors claiming that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is dead or missing have surged across social media since ...

Best of MPC (as selected by the site's author)